[At the end of his New York Times review of the current revival of Horton Foote’s The Trip to Bountiful at the Stephen Sondheim Theatre on West 43rd Street, Ben Brantley mused about the 2005 staging by the Signature Theatre Company which starred Lois Smith as Carrie Watts. Brantley had reviewed that production, too, and I saw it and wrote a short report on the performance. Both Brantley’s and my responses to that revival were quite different from his assessment of the Broadway production which opened on Tuesday, 23 April (and is scheduled to close on 7 July), and I thought it would be interesting to look back at my account, written four days after I saw the performance, of the earlier presentation. Of that production, Brantley recalled in the Times on 24 April: “The 2005 Signature Theater revival of ‘Bountiful,’ starring Lois Smith, left me drenched in tears.”
[Bountiful started its life as an hour-long teleplay. Foote originally wrote it for
Fred Coe, producer of NBC’s Goodyear TV Playhouse, an anthology series alternatively titled the Philco TV Playhouse (because the sponsor varied). It aired on NBC on 1 March 1953 with a cast
headed by the legendary Lillian Gish. (Foote’s
first choice for the lead actress, though, was Shirley Booth, later TV’s Hazel
from 1961 to 1966 who’d just won an Oscar for 1952’s Come Back, Little
Sheba.
She turned down the role because she said she wasn’t ready, at 46, to play
an old woman. Gish was 60.) Also in the TV cast were Eileen Heckart
(Jessie Mae), John Beal (Ludie), Eva Marie Saint (Thelma).
[A
few months later, the Broadway début of The Trip to Bountiful
opened in a Theatre Guild production at
Henry Miller’s Theatre on 3 November 1953 and ran for 39 performances before
closing on 5 December. Carrie was again played
by Gish and Jo Van Fleet (who’d had a small part on television) was Jessie Mae
under the direction of Vincent J. Donehue (who also staged the TV version). Van Fleet won a featured actress Tony and Eva
Marie Saint got a Theatre World Award for her performance as Thelma. Signature’s Trip to Bountiful, which launched the theater’s two-season
15th anniversary celebration, opened at the Peter Norton Space on 4 December
2005, after starting previews on 15 November, and closed on 11 March 2006. The revival was staged by actor Harris Yulin
and costarred Foote’s daughter (and frequent interpreter), Hallie Foote, as the
daughter-in-law, Jessie Mae. The sets were designed by E. David Cosier,
the lights by John McKernon, the costumes by Martin Pakledinaz, and the sound
by Brett R. Jarvis and Loren Toolajian (who teamed to compose the original
music as well). The production
won 2006 Lucille Lortel Awards for Outstanding
Revival, Outstanding Director (Yulin), Outstanding Lead Actress (Smith), and Outstanding
Featured Actress (Hallie Foote); the 2006 Obie Award for Outstanding
Performance (Smith); the 2006 Outer Critics Circle Award for Outstanding
Actress in a Play (Smith); and 2006 Drama Desk Awards for Best Actress (Smith)
and Lifetime Achievement (Horton Foote).]
The Signature Theatre’s Trip to Bountiful, which
I saw at the Peter Norton Space on 42nd Street near
11th Avenue on Friday, 9 December 2005,
was quite excellent all around, and Lois Smith’s performance was superb.
I’ll describe it in a moment, but first, let me relate a true New York
theater moment I had.
After the show, I made a pit stop in the men’s
room. When I came out, a line had formed and about three people from the
door, I spotted Edward Albee. Now, that alone is a New York theater
moment—like the time I saw Colleen Dewhurst sitting alone, smoking in the
upstairs lobby of the Uris Theatre (now the George Gershwin) during the intermission
of Sweeney Todd. But there’s
more.
As I was walking past the line, I heard the
guy in front of Albee, whom I didn’t recognize at all, saying to him, “Someday
I hope to do Virginia
Woolf justice.” Well, my initial instinct
was to make a comment like “I kinda thought somebody already had” as I passed
by, but I decided to keep my mouth shut. So I did.
I
have no idea who the guy talking to Albee was. Was he a director or a
play reader or what? No idea. (It’s
more fun to imagine . . . . If the guy was
a director, maybe he didn’t know that Albee himself had staged a Broadway
revival back in 1976 with Dewhurst and Ben Gazzara. I imagine the playwright feels he’d already
“done Virginia Woolf justice,” don’t
you?) The man looked youngish—say mid-30s or so—and I wasn’t even
sure that Albee knew him. I don’t know if Albee’s like Woody Allen and
doesn’t like to be approached in public, but he looked a little
uncomfortable. Since I was just passing
by on my way out, I may have caught only a momentary reaction and be
misinterpreting the whole scene. Albee didn’t say anything, in any case.
(Actually, that wasn’t the only New York
theater moment I had that evening. As I was walking my dog, Thespis,
before I left for midtown, a large gaggle of young people passed me on my
block. They looked like they were in high school, but I’m betting it’s
college: I live near NYU and the New School, both of which have residence halls
or classroom buildings within a two-block radius of my apartment. Anyway,
just as they were going past, one guy in the middle of the bunch asked out
loud, “What do you know about Ionesco?” A little guy in front—he really
did look like he wasn’t out of high school yet—turned around and announced, “Ionesco?
I love Ionesco!” At which point, he walked backwards right into a woman
trying to make her way down the sidewalk. If it had been Samuel Beckett,
they’d have fallen into a heap on the pavement. But they didn’t.
Just a brief pinball effect.)
And now, the play:
Readers know, I imagine, that I have long
come to distrust Ben Brantley’s opinions in the New York Times.
I truly think he lives in a bubble of his own imagination. He nailed this
one, however. (Even a stopped clock . . . .) Diana, my theater
companion, remarked that this play of Foote’s comes close to Tennessee
Williams, though I don’t feel the lyricism of Williams’s writing. Foote’s
words are far more literal and realistic, but there is a kind of mysterious
force at work in Bountiful
that may have disappeared in Foote’s later, more prosaic treatments of his
Texas homeland. [I wrote this, of course, long before I saw Signature’s
magnificent production of Foote’s three-part Orphans’ Home Cycle. ~Rick]
In any case, the 1953 play (made into a film starring Geraldine Page in
1985) is tender and poignant—perhaps a little too sentimental for today’s
cynical world, but clearly heartfelt and genuine. (I’m not sure, but Bountiful
may have been Foote’s first play—or his first to achieve significant
attention.) I’ve never seen it before (not even the film), so I may be
wrong, but my sense is that its success depends greatly on how the actress
playing Carrie approaches the role—and, of course, how well she handles
it. If she’s too mawkish or spacey or eccentric—a possibility—the play
takes on a strident tone, as if we’re being forced to sympathize with a truly
difficult person—like we’re being manipulated. If the actress gets the idea
right but can’t pull it off with subtlety and honesty, we just won’t believe
it. Lois Smith, as Brantley said, is a marvel on both counts. Her
sense of being imprisoned in the Houston apartment and besieged by her
insensitive and selfish daughter-in-law (Hallie Foote, the author’s daughter),
is palpable, but not overstated. This is not Blanche Dubois grown into
old age—Smith’s Carrie is just an old woman with a bad heart who’s made some
sad choices in life and now just wants to go back to the place where she was
happy, probably to die. The fact that Jessie Mae, the daughter-in-law,
pretty much treats her as an unwanted house pet—Jessie Mae won’t let Carrie
sing hymns in the house because they get on her nerves—only makes this all
the more credible. Carrie’s not eccentric or crazy—which is what Jessie
Mae calls her, the only thing she does that actually makes her husband, Ludie
(Devon Abner), angry—just a little sentimental in her old age, and suffering
from terminal cabin fever.
Carrie has a history of running away, trying
to get to Bountiful, whenever she’s left unwatched and alone in the cramped
two-room apartment—she sleeps in the living/dining room—in Houston, and this
infuriates Jessie Mae, who confiscates Carrie’s pension checks as much to keep
her tied to the apartment as to pay for her own visits to the beauty parlor and
her Cokes at the drugstore. (Ludie has just gotten a real job after a
long unemployment due to an unspecified illness. Jessie Mae not only
doesn’t work, but doesn’t seem to do much housekeeping, either; Carrie does the
dusting and cooking, it seems—despite her bad heart.) I actually rooted
for her to break loose, and when Jessie
Mae reveals that a pension check, due that morning, seems to be missing from
the mail, you just know that Carrie has glommed onto it and is holding it in
reserve for a break-out. When Jessie Mae decides to take a chance and
leave Carrie at home while she meets a friend at the drugstore for a Coke—she
can’t get a beauty parlor appointment until 4 p.m., and she just can’t sit
around all that time—I root again that Carrie’ll get away this time, just as
she does, in fact. As Smith plays her, Carrie just deserves
to get back to Bountiful once before she dies. (It may be a bit contrived
that, first, the bus doesn’t go to Bountiful—you can’t get there from
here!—and, second, it turns out that the town has in fact simply died when the
last inhabitant, Carrie’s girlhood friend, whom she had hoped to stay with,
died a few days before. Contrived, but perfectly apt: the dream she has,
after all, is also a chimera.)
The fact that Carrie charms everyone she
meets, except for her daughter-in-law, from Thelma (Meghan Andrews), a young
woman traveling on the same bus, to the ticket clerk (Frank Girardeau) at the town
nearest Bountiful where she gets off to the sheriff (Jim Demarse) who’s been
ordered to hold her until Ludie arrives to take her back to the big city (the
sheriff ultimately drives her out to her old farm in Bountiful and stays with
her until Ludie comes) is only proof that Carrie’s really just a dear lost
soul. Smith captures this absolutely perfectly. There’s not an
eccentric, peculiar, or idiosyncratic element in her performance—it’s just
solid and real. She’s not even especially sad or pathetic; she’s just a
little driven. Once she gets “home,” you can see that she’s satisfied her
itch, even though she knows she can’t stay, even to die. She’ll go back
to Houston with Ludie and Jessie Mae and obey all the rules her daughter-in-law
lays out—because she’s been home and seen the sky and the soil and the
birds. That’s all she ever wanted—and now she’s content. Ludie may
have learned something, too, by coming home—he remembers everything Carrie had
been telling him about his boyhood there, even though he pretended not to
have. But Jessie Mae hasn’t, and you can guess that she’s in for some
surprises back in Houston. (Ludie had been contemplating asking his boss
for a raise at work that morning, and we learn that the boss was pleased to
give it to him. I took this as a suggestion that he’s getting back his
self-confidence, and something of the spine he must have inherited from
Carrie.)
Hallie Foote does what I take to be a good
job on Jessie Mae. It seemed to me she was written as an unchanging single
note, and Foote manages to pull off the once or twice she appreciates Carrie
without making it seem contrived (by Horton Foote) or begrudging (by Jessie
Mae). As selfish as she is, this suggests that there’s a human being back
there, though it’s not much. If Foote’s portrayal is one-dimensional, I
think it’s the play’s fault more than the actresses (or director Harris Yulin’s).
Ludie, too, is appropriately meek and submissive. Not abject: there’s
some indication here also that he’s not only what we see here. I don’t
know Devon Abner, the actor who played the role (he seems to be mostly a writer
for stage and screen), but I don’t think that the character’s
one-dimensionality is his fault, either. (This is why I say that the
success of the play depends so much on the actress playing Carrie. Even
the best director couldn’t do much with the other roles, and the script is the
script. Not that Yulin did anything wrong at all.)
E. David Cosier’s set (lit by John McKernon) was
kind of nice, too. It sort of reminded me of a pop-up book in a
way. Bountiful
is a long one-act (an hour and 50 minutes without intermission), so each scene
is like a new page of the story in a sense. Each time the scene shifted,
the old set moved off and the new set moved on, courtesy of electrical
motors with low-tech assist (that is, stage hands or actors moving set
pieces on dollies). It isn’t in the least innovative, but it worked, and,
as I said, it was like each time you turned the page, a new scene popped
up. (Well, okay—popped in. Let’s not
quibble over prepositions.) I never felt I was
being made to sit too long, though, and I have at other, shorter shows.
I guess the summation is that while The Trip to Bountiful
isn’t ever going to be earth-shaking theater (it’s more like William Inge than
Tennessee Williams, I think), it’s lovely, truthful, and, in this production,
nicely done. After so much bad theater over the last couple of
seasons—bad plays or bad productions or both—this was more than a
pleasure. And Lois Smith, whom I only know from TV (mostly) and film, was
a true delight. She’s too young for the role to have been written for her
(she’d only have been about 23 when the play was written)—but if Horton Foote
had come around to see this performance, I suspect he’d have wondered if he
hadn’t been clairvoyant half a century ago.
* * * *
The
press response, with one glaring exception, was nearly ecstatic, particularly
about Lois Smith’s portrayal of Carrie Watts.
In 2005, I didn’t do the review survey that I customarily do now, so
I’ll recap the critical reception here.
The only wholly negative review was Bob Kent’s in Variety, which noted that “the new revival of ‘Trip to Bountiful’
at Signature Theatre Company is regrettably flat and underwhelming.” Kent acknowledged, “At times this production
nails exactly the right bemused observational tone” but continued that
“director Harris Yulin’s production remains stubbornly average.” The
Variety review-writer did observe, “By herself, Smith nearly makes this a
worthwhile ‘Trip,’ but concluded that “it feels more like a faintly tiresome
holiday gathering.” No one else I read agreed,
it seems.
Since I started
this revived report with Ben Brantley’s 2013
Times review (and alluded to his earlier one above), I’ll continue with his
notice of the 2005 STC restaging, which he called “beautifully mounted.” Yulin’s direction, said the Timesman, “finds the emotional
authenticity” of Foote’s script that makes it “seem newborn.” Praising all the elements of the physical production,
Brantley made special mention of the set design: “What follows the opening
scenes has an almost mystical seamlessness, as Mr. Cosier's sets float on and
off the stage.” (By the way, Brantley’s
remarks in his review of the 2013 Broadway revival about being brought to tears
were rendered thus in 2005: “[T]his production . . . finds the emotional
authenticity in a 1953 drama often remembered as a tear-jerking chestnut. This is not to say that you should attend the
show without an ample supply of handkerchiefs.”) In New York’s Daily News, Howard Kissel wrote, “The production . . . is pure
joy.” Having compared Foote’s dramaturgy
to Chekhov’s, Kissel added that Bountiful
“has been given a radiant revival by the Signature Theater Company” in
which, “under Harris Yulin’s skilled direction, every moment resonates
deeply.” Calling the production
“genuinely moving,” Sam Thielman of Long Island’s Newsday especially complimented Cosier, who’s “set shifts quickly
into various instantly recognizable configurations.” Dubbing the STC revival of Bountiful “touching,” the New York Post’s Frank Scheck declared,
“Foote’s play is a marvel of economy, one in which numerous important themes
are conveyed through the simplest of situations and dialogue” which “Director
Harris Yulin has staged . . . expertly.” After observing that “there are stretches of
obvious exposition and a melodramatic monologue or two,” David Sheward of Back Stage summed the revival up by
pronouncing it “a journey well worth taking.”
Sean O’Donnell of Show Business asserted,
“Director Harris Yulin successfully weaves a quiet tapestry of nostalgic
yearning in a production that is nothing short of breathtaking” and that the performance
“resonates long after the curtain has fallen.” In Time Out New York, Robert Simonson affirmed simply, “Yulin, Smith
and company have achieved something of quiet excellence.”
The cyber press was
pretty much in line with the paper-and-ink reviewers. On Talkin’ Broadway, Matthew Murray
wrote that “director Harris Yulin has lovingly interpreted Bountiful for
the rich new Signature Theatre Company revival” and Elyse Sommer of
CurtainUp said the “beautiful new production” was “a trip worth taking”
that’s “remarkably timely.” TheatreMania’s
David Finkle reported that STC’s revival of Trip to Bountiful “is to be
cherished” and that ”Harris Yulin has directed the play with compassion and
tenderness.” On nytheatre.com, Martin
Denton described the production as “lovely, immensely satisfying, and . . .
just about flawless,” a “fertile, generous, and lush a theatrical experience” that’s
“about as perfect a production as one could wish for.” Michael Dale of BroadwayWorld dubbed
Signature’s revival “beautiful and tender,” having been “delicately directed
with a selectively lazy touch by Harris Yulin.”
“Go and be enthralled,” he urged.
It was the acting,
though, that got most of the press attention, starting with TONY’s Simonson, who declared, “As for the rest of the ensemble, any
aspiring actor seeking an object lesson on what can be made of a small role
need look no further. Even the
nonspeaking actors shine—a tribute to the thoughtful, seamless rhythms Yulin
has wrought.” TheatreMania’s Finkle wrote that the production, especially the final scene, “is
exquisitely acted by all” and, pronouncing the STC revival of Bountiful “acted with quiet skill by the
best ensemble cast in town,” the Wall
Street Journal’s Terry Teachout added, “I doubt you’ll ever see it acted
better, especially by Ms. Smith.” As
befits an actor’s journal, Sheward asserted, “Director Harris Yulin has
assembled an ensemble of sensitive performers who inhabit Foote’s frustrated
souls,” in Back Stage and Brantley of
the Times found that the “supporting
cast . . . never strikes a false note.” And though most of the cast was singled out
for mention in all the notices, Newsday’s
Thielman praised Hallie Foote, who “wisely underplays one of her father’s least
likeable characters,” and Kissel correctly observed that the actress “manages
to catch the humor of the
daughter-in-law without making her an easy villain.”
“But the evening
ultimately belongs to Smith,” reported the Post’s
Scheck, adding that “the actress seems to sum up the entire human experience in
her memorable performance.” The Postman declared, “Lois Smith creates magic of her own” as “the veteran
actress delivers a performance that is at once heartbreaking in its pathos and
uplifting in its spirit.” Newsman Kissel described Smith’s singular
performance as “incandescent,” specifying that the actress “does not minimize
how difficult Carrie can be, but she also captures the poignance of precarious
old age.” Asserted Thielman, “Smith’s sweet, sad senility as Carrie Watts gives
Horton Foote’s ‘The Trip to Bountiful’ the tang it needs,” adding that in the
end, “Lois Smith brings a real sense of loss to her part, making it sting as
she discovers, bit by bit, that Bountiful, Texas, is barely on the map
anymore.” Back Stager Sheward characterized
Smith’s work as “luminous,” and WSJ’s
Teachout praised her acting as “so beautifully straightforward that you feel as
though you’re eavesdropping on her.” “Luminescence,”
which is what David Finkle said Smith brought to her performance, seemed to
have been a leitmotif in the reviews,
though BroadwayWorld’s Dale used a
near-synonym when he wrote that Smith “sparkles as Carrie.” The Village
Voice’s Michael Feingold wrote that “Lois Smith proves herself . . . with a
performance that manages to be simultaneously feisty and moonstruck,”
concluding that “Smith makes her unfulfilled goal as transcendent as Don
Quixote’s knight-errantry.” Feingold
ended his praise of Smith with a gratuitous jab at our then-ruling family: “To
watch her mingling of crab and saint is to feel a little of the wonder that
Texas used to mean before the fake cowboys of Kennebunkport invaded.” (I just had to include that little dig!) While Talkin’
Broadway’s Murray quibbled about
Smith’s portrayal in contrast to Lillian Gish’s, Sommer called her performance
“solid gold” on CurtainUp.
In his review, the Times’s Brantley also called “that fine actress for all seasons” Lois
Smith’s acting “luminous,” but he seemed possessed by her “cerulean
stare.” As if mesmerized, he confessed,
“I had never before realized how blue and bottomless her gaze is.” Later, Brantley observed the Smith’s eyes
“brim with the expectation of a child on the morning of her birthday” and even
compares the lighting of John McKernon and the music and sound design of Loren
Toolajian and Brett R. Jarvis with “the glow in Ms. Smith's gaze.”
* *
* *
[There’d been speculation, including
some in the press, that STC’s revival might have a Broadway run in its
future. James Houghton, the company’s
artistic. director, sought a Broadway theater for a transfer of Bountiful after its run at the Norton Space but none
was available. Having already extended the
revival at the Norton as long as possible, Houghton rejected a transfer to a
larger Off-Broadway house because the expense was too great for the potential box
office benefit. As a result, a rep
theater show that was both popular and well-received critically didn’t get a
chance at a broader audience.
[The Signature Theatre Company’s 15th Anniversary Season
was divided into two parts. In 2005-06,
the company staged plays by previous writers-in-residence: Foote’s Trip
to Bountiful and John Guare’s Landscape of the Body. In 2006-07, STC scheduled the
delayed August Wilson season that had been postponed when the playwright died
in October 2005. Previously, STC presented its first Horton
Foote season in 1994-95, including Talking Pictures, Night
Seasons, The Young Man From Atlanta, and Laura Dennis. But Foote is the only playwright to whom
Signature has devoted two complete seasons, mounting that monumental three-part,
nine-play autobiographical opus, The Orphans’ Home Cycle, in 2009-10.
[I got to see Lois Smith on stage again subsequent to
this marvelous performance when I saw STC’s presentation of Tony Kushner’s The Illusion, a translation
and adaptation from Pierre Corneille, in June 2011 (see my blog report posted on 1 July 2011). Smith played the sorceress, Alcandre,
usually a male role, in the final presentation of STC’s Kushner residency. I got to see her briefly after the
performance—playing opposite her as Pridamant was a former teacher of mine,
David Margulies, so I waited by the stage door to say hello to him—and I got to
tell Smith how much I liked her work in Bountiful and even in HBO’s
True Blood on TV.]
No comments:
Post a Comment