All right, tell the truth.
Aren’t hot wings and Buffalo wings the same things? I mean, really—they’re both made from the
usually-discarded part of the bird, the part that mostly ends up in the soup
pot; they’re both cooked up crisp and then covered in a spicy sauce; most
people like to dip them in another sauce like blue cheese or ranch; and almost
everyone who eats them, eats them in a bar or in the living room with a big
game like the Super Bowl on TV.
In fact there are so many recipes for both chicken wing
snacks—scores, maybe even hundreds—that it’s probably impossible to distinguish
hot wings from Buffalo wings. As far as
I can determine, the main difference—if it’s even accurate—is that the basis of
the hot sauce for Buffalo wings is cayenne pepper and for hot wings it’s chili
peppers.
The only real difference is that Buffalo wings were invented
in Buffalo, New York, and hot wings come from down south; Memphis, Tennessee, is the hot-wing capital of the country, in terms of the number of raw wings sold
and cooked ones consumed, though whether they were first concocted there is
arguable.
Almost inarguable is that Buffalo wings, the ones people dip
in the blue cheese sauce, were introduced in 1964 in a bar. Hot wings, the ones dipped in ranch dressing
(though not always), showed up in Memphis around 1990, sold from a food truck
(and 1992 in a restaurant). An annual hot-wing
festival in April began in Memphis in 2002; a Buffalo wing festival started in
2001.
But if you press the point of which town really served the
first spicy chicken wings—you might well find yourself in a . . . well, heated
argument, let’s say. (If you want to
argue whose wings are better . . . well, that’s probably not a real good idea.)
According to the hot-wing chef in Katori Hall’s The Hot
Wing King, though, his family recipe for the dish dates back to 1808. Oh, and he comes from Saint Louis—though I
don’t know that he wasn’t born in Memphis, where the play is set.
According to the website
This Week in New York, Hall was moved to write The Hot Wing King, her third and last production of her
Residency 5 at the Signature Theatre Company, in part because of
that annual festival, the Southern Hot Wing Festival, in Memphis, her hometown
(about which she writes frequently). The
festival includes a hot-wing cooking competition which is central to the play
and initiates the events that unfold.
Hall, 38, a playwright, writer, actress, and social and
political activist, was born in Memphis.
According to an interview in Art
Works Blog, a website of the National Endowment for the Arts, Hall’s
parents told stories around the dinner table, recounting their day at work and
playing all the characters, and she credits this practice for her attraction to
theater. “It was like watching
one-person shows at the kitchen table.” As
a girl, she staged plays in her family’s living room.
In 1999, she graduated from Craigmont High School in Memphis
as the first African-American valedictorian. After high school, Hall attended New York City’s
Columbia University, graduating in 2003 with a major in African-American
Studies and Creative Writing. She was
awarded top departmental honors from the university’s Institute for Research in
African-American Studies (IRAAS).
In 2005, she graduated from the American Repertory Theater’s
Institute for Advanced Theater Training at Harvard University with a Master of
Fine Arts in Acting, and then spent two years as an actress in New York,
working on stage and in TV. She then
entered the Juilliard School’s Lila Acheson Wallace playwriting program,
graduating in 2009.
Hall’s been a book reviewer, journalist (another form of
storytelling), and essayist for publications such as the Boston Globe, Essence, Newsweek and the New York Times. She’s also been
a Kennedy Center Playwriting Fellow at the Eugene O’Neill Theater Center of
Waterford, Connecticut.
She’s probably best known as the author of The Mountaintop, her play about Martin
Luther King, Jr.’s last night before his assassination at the Lorraine Motel in
Memphis on 4 April 1968, which premièred in London in 2009 to great critical acclaim.
The
Mountaintop opened on Broadway on 13 October 2011, starring Samuel L.
Jackson (in his Broadway début) as King and Angela Bassett as a mysterious
maid. Directed by Kenny Leon, it ran 117
regular performances and 24 previews, closing on 22 January 2012.
Hall is also the book-writer, with Frank Ketelaar and Kees
Prins, of Tina: The Tina Turner Musical,
the current juke-boxer that opened in November at Broadway’s Lunt-Fontanne
Theatre. Other work includes Hurt Village (2012; currently in
development as a feature film to be Hall’s film-directing début) and Our Lady of Kibeho (2014), Hall’s
previous Residency 5 offerings at STC, and
Children of Killers (2011). (Signature’s Residency 5 guarantees each
playwright three productions of new plays over the course of a five-year
residency.)
Hall has very strong socio-political views; race and
ethnicity are often elemental to her dramaturgy. The dramatist tries to represent the
African-America community in her plays and promotes or celebrates social
change.
When, while taking an acting class at Columbia, Hall’s teacher told the class to find plays with
characters who looked like them, Hall and her scene partner, another young
Southern black woman, searched the university library to no avail. There were no plays with two black women in
the cast, so Hall thought: “I have to write those plays, then. I have to carry that baton forward and write
us into existence because if I don’t who else will?"
In 2017, she was named artistic director of the Hattiloo
Theater, an African-American repertory theater in Memphis dedicated to “the
diversity of black expression.” Hall
said “she hopes to help bring about ‘a renaissance, a revitalization of the
arts in Memphis.’” Hall’s dedication to
her city and her heritage is expressed in a comment she made at the time: “Everything
that Memphis is, is represented in my
art.”
Hall’s awards include a Laurence Olivier Award, Susan Smith
Blackburn Award, Lark Play Development Center Playwrights of New York (PONY)
Fellowship, Kate Neal Kinley Fellowship, two Lecompte du Nouy Prizes from
Lincoln Center, Fellowship of Southern Writers Bryan Family Award in Drama, NYFA
(New York Foundation for the Arts) Fellowship, and the Lorraine Hansberry
Playwriting Award. Hall was shortlisted
for the London Evening Standard Most
Promising Playwright Award and received the Otis Guernsey New Voices
Playwriting Award from the William Inge Theatre Festival. She is a member of the Fellowship of Southern
Writers, the Ron Brown Scholar Program, and the Coca-Cola Scholar Program.
The world première of The Hot Wing King began
performances at the Pershing Square Signature Center’s Alice Griffin Jewel Box
Theatre, the company’s 191-seat proscenium house, on 11 February 2020; the
production, directed by Hall’s collaborator, Steven H. Broadnax, III, opened on
1 March. I caught the 7:30 p.m.
performance on Friday, 6 March. After
one extension for the originally announced final performance on 15 March, Hot
Wing King was scheduled to close on 22 March, but the coronavirus
pandemic caused Signature to cease all performances after 11 March.
In the Memphis house owned by Dwayne (Korey Jackson), a
successful hotel manager, Cordell (Toussaint Jeanlouis) is preparing the
ingredients for the town’s annual hot-wing contest. He’s sure he has a good chance of winning the
$5,000 prize this year with a new recipe, “Cajun Alfredo with Bourbon-Infused
Crumbled Bacon”—especially with the help of his friends Dwayne, Isom (Sheldon
Best), and Big Charles (Nicco Annan).
The four African-American men are all gay and Cordell is Dwayne’s
housemate and lover.
Two months ago, the forty-ish Cordell left his wife, two
sons, and job as a FedEx executive in St.
Louis to move in with Dwayne. His
wife won’t sign the divorce papers and Cordell hasn’t been able to find a job
in Memphis and he feels a little like a kept man in Dwayne’s house—not that
Dwayne, an eminently reasonable and thoughtful man, has said or done anything
to give this impression
Cordell’s team, the New Wing Order, who gather for this
occasion every year—Cordell has entered before, but never won—consists of his
and Dwayne’s closest friends who treat the occasion as a special event for the
four of them. Isom, in his thirties and
the youngest of the group, is an outright flamer, femmy, outrageous, and funny;
when Dwayne gives the men special team shirts for the contest, Isom adds
glitter to his and cuts the bottom off to reveal his midriff. (The costumes are the work of Emilio Sosa,
who seems to have had the most fun with Isom’s garb.) During the first scene, sports-loving Big
Charles keeps running back to the TV in the living room to check on a game in
progress while Cordell is organizing the prep in the kitchen.
The whole process is almost-organized chaos, and supplies
the comedy for Hall’s bifurcated play: half sit-com and half family drama. The cracks in Dwayne and Cordell’s
relationship are a hint of the drama to come, and it gets a boost from the
arrival of Dwayne’s former brother-in-law, TJ (Eric B. Robinson, Jr.). TJ’s a drug-dealer and small-time crook. He was married to Dwayne’s sister, an
emotionally disturbed woman who died while under police restraint and Dwayne
feels guilty because he had called the cops when she was having an episode.
TJ’s come by to leave a package of money for his son,
sixteen-year-old Everett, known as “EJ” (Cecil Blutcher), who shows up himself
asking to stay with his uncle. Dwayne’s
guilt over the death of EJ’s mother, which the boy witnessed, compels him to
look on the boy as his responsibility; he wants his nephew to live with him and
Cordell—though Cordell has misgivings about the prospect. EJ’s also a high school basketball star and
Cordell, a former Georgetown Hoya b-ball player, tries to bond with his lover’s
nephew over a little one-on-one on the backyard court.
The Hot Wing King shifts between the sit-com
manicness of the cooking contest, which takes place mostly in the up-left
kitchen of Michael Carnahan’s open-walled set, and the melodrama of the
extended-family situation, which happens in the rest of the house, including
the up-right bedroom, meant to be upstairs, that EJ will occupy, and the down-left
back terrace where the basketball hoop is located. The living room, fittingly at center stage,
is neutral territory where scenes from both the cooking comedy and the family drama
play out.
The two parts of the play do cross over some, but TJ is
pretty much exclusively involved in the family plot, though his son enters the
cooking comedy near the end of the play when Dwayne makes him an honorary
member of the New Wing Order. Big
Charles and Isom stick mostly to the cooking scenario—Isom takes an action that
effects the outcome of the competition, but I won’t reveal it now (though Hall
telegraphs it long before its repercussions are seen); only Dwayne and Cordell
are really part of both elements of The Hot Wing King.
This isn’t the kind of play in which any real disaster
occurs; the most dramatic thing to happen to Dwayne’s circle is the result of
the hot-wing contest (which I also won’t reveal). In the end, everyone is accommodated, even the
criminally-inclined TJ. What Hall’s
writing about isn’t the hot-wing contest or the conflict among Dwayne, TJ, and
EJ; the play’s also not about the potential conflict between Dwayne and Cordell
(who never actually brings up his concerns to Dwayne).
In addition to the Memphis hot-wing festival, Hall also drew
inspiration for The Hot Wing King from the relationship of her
brother and his lover, but the play isn’t really about gay men, black men, or
gay black men; neither gayness nor race is an issue: the first is only
mentioned a few times more or less in passing and the second not at all. The Hot Wing King’s about how these
guys, who are mostly unrelated to one another, make a family.
I can’t tell you much detail, at least not cogently, about
Katori Hall’s Hot Wing King. The production, which ran two
hours and 20 minutes with one intermission, was well done, and the acting was
fine . . . but I couldn’t understand about two-thirds of what anyone was
saying!
The problem I had—and I really hate to put this into words—is
that they spoke in Southern black colloquialisms, like code. One reviewer called it “the vibrant dialect
of black Memphis,” and, from their laughter, it seemed most of the rest of the
audience got the idiom.
It wasn’t a serious drawback for me when two of the men were
just talking—then I could understand them fine. (These scenes had another
problem, though it wasn’t about comprehension, but believability.) When the guys are all together and runnin’
off at the mouth, which they do a lot, it was just all gobbledygook to
me. I couldn’t even distinguish individual words—or even individual
speakers!
I can tell what Hall’s main theme for the play is; that
really comes out in the quieter one-on-one scenes. It’s not a bad point—but I had to sit through
all the incomprehensible scenes of code-talk while Hall and her characters make
it.
As I said, however, Broadnax’s production was fine aside
from this problem—which, I suppose, was at least partly my failing for not
knowing the characters’ vernacular. (I
wasn’t the only spectator with this difficulty.
Michael Sommers of New York Stage
Review remarked, “Frankly, some of the deeply Southern-fried lingo escaped
my old Eastern Seaboard ears . . . .”) Perhaps
the director could have found a way to accommodate the old, white Northerners like
me without sacrificing the veracity—or verisimilitude is maybe a more accurate
word—of the characters and milieu, but I’m not convinced he could have.
I would never say, though, that the actors were anything
less than convincing either in their characterizations of the six Memphians or in
their use of the local argot. The cast
as a whole, especially the four New Wing Order members, formed a true
mini-community, a club to which they all belonged. Another word for this might be . . . family.
The only times that this sense of closeness and familiarity is
strained is when the play waxes serious.
In those moments, Hall wrote the characters dialogue that’s hyper poetic
and lofty—the polar opposite of the local patois. The tonal shift doesn’t quite work smoothly,
and as much as the actors worked to make the sober scenes sound like
conversation, the dialogue kept coming out as epigraphs.
(In his New York Times review of Hall’s play, Ben Brantley, who had
a complaint similar to mine, quotes one example of this shift in diction. This is Cordell speaking to Dwayne: “I see
why you steady [sic] treat me like a
child. I am. It’s like I’ve just been pushed out of the
womb and I’m getting hit with the cold and the air and the lights and the
truth.”)
As in any good ensemble play, all the actors performed at
the same level of excellence. Even in
the scenes which I had a hard time understanding, I had no difficulty feeling
that the actors understood one another completely, playing off (and with) one
another like the close and fond friends they were supposed to be. The quality of the cast and the work of
Broadnax was not in doubt.
Singling out a few for the significance of their roles,
either for their function in the plot or the character challenge Hall gave
them, I compliment Korey Jackson for making Dwayne the levelheaded stalwart he
is. Jackson makes him unquestionably the
pater of this ad hoc familias,
keeping everyone on an even keel. The
actor keeps Dwayne outwardly on control, even as he lets us see the turmoil
he’s feeling inside.
As his partner, Cordell, Toussaint Jeanlouis conveys his
seriousness about making his hot wings, no matter how lightly anyone else may
take the task. He can seem as
even-tempered as Dwayne, but he’s far more fragile, and Toussaint lets this out
at times then hides it away at others.
As Isom, the most flamboyant character in The Hot Wing King, Sheldon
Best plays the hell out of his character; it’s hard to tell who’s having more
fun, Best or Isom. He literally light ups
the stage and makes the most of Sosa’s costumes.
Best is also one of the two darlings of reviewers in
Broadnax’s production. The other is Cecil
Blutcher, making his Off-Broadway début as the young EJ. Now, Blutcher is considerably older than EJ,
and the extra maturity and self-control shows in the way the actor conveys EJ’s
confusion and hurt over the death of his mother and his father’s less-than
conscientious parenting and his own wish to go down a different path than
TJ. In Blutcher’s hands, EJ’s outbursts
and recriminations still indicate an underlying yearning and even goodness. The actor’s delivery of a horrifying speech
describing his mother’s shooting reveals a lot about EJ and his troubled
demeanor.
I’ve already described Michael Carnahan’s set, which
comprised four playing areas (in descending order of activity: kitchen, living
room, back yard patio, and upstairs bedroom).
One reviewer, Marilyn Stasio of Variety, thought the concept was superfluous, but I (like most of the
published reviewers) found it well used and practical in terms of an acting
environment, not to mention a fine visual representation of Dwayne’s
comfortable, un-showy, middle-class lifestyle.
(The kitchen incidentally, is practical and the men actually cook the
sauce on stage—so the Griffin is filled with the aroma of cooking hot-wing
sauce.)
Sosa’s costumes did
the same thing for the characters: display each one’s personality and way of
presenting themselves to the world in an unobtrusive (well, except for Isom’s
flashy dress) way. Alan C. Edwards’s
lighting nicely isolates or integrates the different playing areas as needed
while still allowing us to be aware that this is a home, not a series of
rooms. (Carnahan’s open walls go a long
way to establishing this from preset; though we know there are “walls” there,
no room is unconnected from any other.)
I’ve collected a dozen reviews of The Hot Wing King to
survey. Brantley in the Times acknowledged that the play “has
its problems” but continued that “this likable but lumpy production . . . is
never better than when its all-male ensemble is functioning as an awkward but
interdependent unit.” The characters “have
that palpable, physical ease with one another, both contented and irritable,
that comes from being part of a family.”
Hall, Brantley contended, “is asking what constitutes a family in a
world of fragmentation.” He added that
the core characters are gay “allows Hall to challenge conventional definitions
of manhood and fatherhood in black America,” using “the bright, peppy context
of a classical sitcom structure to do so.”
“The balance between social soap opera and buoyant comedy
isn’t always gracefully sustained,” reported the Timesman, further noting, “Nor is the script able to comfortably
fold its more somber subplots into the running, frantic story of the cooking
contest.” Furthermore, Brantley found, “When
characters . . . talk about their deeper feelings, they tend to shift into
improbably poetic flights of diction.”
“What’s refreshing here is the matter-of-fact depiction of
black gay characters who may be dissatisfied, to varying degrees, with their
own behavior but not, ultimately, because of their sexuality,” asserted the Times reviewer.
In the Wall Street Journal, Terry
Teachout, quipping that “Katori Hall’s plays remind me of a sign I once saw
over the front door of an unpretentious little restaurant: ‘NOT FANCY, BUT
GOOD,’” observed that “there's nothing fancy about the down-to-earth dramaturgy
of Ms. Hall's kitchen-sink chronicles of family life in all its varied aspects.”
All she does—if “all” is the
word—is tell stories about ordinary men and women who, as Jack Webb said of the
characters in “Dragnet,” sound “as real as a guy pouring a cup of coffee.” Yet truth gushes out every time they open
their mouths, and before you know it, you’re caught up in their lives and
fates.
Teachout dubbed Hall “one of the best playwrights we have,”
and labeled The Hot Wing King “her finest play yet.” After describing the situations in Hall’s
script, the WSJ review-writer
explained that “while ‘The Hot Wing King’ starts off playing the resulting
complications for belly laughs, they end up being deeply, darkly serious.”
Variety’s Stasio warned would-be theatergoers, “Good luck trying to
follow the meandering plot of ‘The Hot Wing King,’” which she labels a “good-natured
kitchen comedy.” Stasio asserted, “Director Steve H. Broadnax
III gets the best results when he keeps everybody and his uncle squished into
the narrow kitchen.”
The Variety reviewer continued, “Those crowd scenes work so well, you wonder why
Hall . . . and her design team even bothered with the superfluous settings of a
living room and an upstairs bedroom. It
certainly wasn’t demanded by the loose-limbed plot,” Stasio felt. “Although it presents itself as a gay sitcom,
the ‘sit’ isn’t sturdy enough to sustain the ‘com,’ which actually comes from
the extremely likable characters.”
On TheaterScene.com,
Julia Polinsky declared, “The play pushes all kinds of buttons and does it
well. Humor, anger, resentment,
ambition, family, love, commitment: it’s all there, alternating between
hilarious and searing.” Polinsky
reported that Hall “has written The Hot Wing King in a
rapid-fire, delicious-sounding vernacular, which helps the play feel completely
natural.” The playwright “knows how to
make you care as deeply about these men as Cordell cares about his wings,” felt
the review-writer. “Which is
particularly interesting, because the basic story is pretty well-worn.” Polinsky made some pertinent observations:
Lacking the milieu of gay
African-American men, The Hot Wing King could be almost
tedious—yawn, again? The wayward teenage
son looking for redemption? The couple
that’s uncomfortable with one person’s sacrifice and the other’s controlling
behavior? The friends, one warmhearted
and wise, the other giddy and silly? Sorry,
but what’s new? Been there, done that;
let’s move on. But Hall’s vivid
characterizations and superb language, coupled with outstanding performances
and terrific direction from Steve H. Broadnax III, makes The Hot Wing
King feel fresh and new. Not to
mention, the knockout scenic design . . . and costumes that effortlessly create
character . . . make it all work. Really
well. Really, really well.
The reviewer concluded with the admonition: “Those tears in
your eyes at The Hot Wing King? They
might be from the heat of some Suicide Flats, or from the heart of this tale of
ambition, love, family, and Pili-Pili powder.”
Labeling The Hot
Wing King a “delectable new play,” James Wilson on Talkin’
Broadway remarked: “It is
not uncommon for a theater production to appeal to the visual and aural senses,
but it is rare that a show gets people talking about the enticing smells.” Wilson quickly added, “To its credit, The
Hot Wing King has abundant pleasures beyond its attention to aromatic
detail. Hall,” he reported, “artfully
mixes a heaping dose of comedy, a dollop of sentimentality, and a dash of
social commentary to create a rich and satisfying theater experience.”
The TB reviewer lamented that the play “sometimes
drifts into broad and formulaic situation-comedy mode, but the actors
skillfully inject the characters . . . with complex humanity.” He caviled a bit that, “[r]unning nearly two
and a half hours, the play arrives a little overdone,” backing off, however,
because “[t]here are a lot of laughs.” Compared
to other recent black-themed plays, Wilson asserted, “Hall’s The Hot
Wing King does not push the boundaries of theatrical form and style in
ways that other shows have, but it is certainly a viable contender.” He concluded, “In its unabashed treatment of
sexuality, masculinity and race, it is a play to be applauded and savored.”
On TheaterScene.net (not affiliated with
the above-cited TheaterScene.com), Darryl
Reilly labeled Hall’s play “uplifting” and said it’s “where comedy and drama
deftly converge.” He proclaimed it a “rewarding
contemporary work.” The reviewer praised
“Hall’s gorgeous dialogue” as “a compendium of punchy lingo, colloquialisms and
everyday realism,” and found, “Her command of structure is impeccable as the
events unfold with force, suspense and insight.”
Reilly labeled
Broadnax’s staging “sharp,” Carnahan’s set design “artful,” Edwards’s lighting
“adroit,” sound designers Luqman Brown and Robert Kaplowitz’s effects “sparkling,”
and Sosa’s costumes “stylish.” In
conclusion, he affirmed, “The Hot Wing King’s accomplished depth
continues to substantiate Hall’s preeminence as a leading playwright.”
The Hot Wing King “is a moderately heartwarming,
sometimes amusing, occasionally clichéd dramedy with sitcom overtones,”
declared Samuel L. Leiter on his blog, Theatre’s Leiter Side. “Performed
under Steve H. Broadnax III’s buoyant direction, with raucous energy,” Leiter
complained, “Balancing sitcom business and darker issues is a precarious
endeavor that the play doesn’t always master.”
The “jokes and bickering” that dominate the first part of the play until
“[e]ventually, more serious personal matters intrude” forces “a tonal shift.”
The work of the
design team, Leiter wrote, “go far to making The Hot Wing King tasty, although
not quite enough to sustain a two hour and 20 minute meal.” The actors “definitely make The Hot Wing King
a sweet-tasting, if not particularly hot, concoction that many will enjoy,” but
Leiter, like me, warned that “many listeners . . . will find themselves
depending more on the expressive acting than the words spoken to follow along
closely.”
Zachary Stewart characterized The Hot Wing King as
“a sensitive portrait of black masculinity, and the tension that can arise
between fathers and sons when they don't see eye-to-eye,” on TheaterMania. “The
linguistic richness of The Hot Wing King makes it particularly
delicious to hear,” affirmed Stewart.
Through clever wordplay, shameless
vowel substitution, and ’90s pop music references, these men have developed a
vernacular that feels central to their identities as individuals and cohesion
as a community.
“Steve H. Broadnax III has directed a snappy production that
seamlessly slides back and forth over the border between comedy and drama,”
reported the TM reviewer. Stewart praised Carnahan’s set, but he
declared Sosa’s costumes “brilliant.”
The reviewer’s final comment was: “But as both a comedy and a
drama, The Hot Wing King is quite filling, and will leave you
with a satisfying aftertaste days later.”
On New York Theatre
Guide, Stanford Friedman called Hall’s play “a tasty new work” that “comes
in three flavors.”
As directed by Steve H. Broadnax
III, it is a classic buddy comedy with friends and lovers involved in bouts of
physical tomfoolery and good-natured ribbing. It is also a honey-glazed drama seasoned with
uncertainty and dipped in guilt. And it
is a hot take on sons and fathers, biological and otherwise, in black America .
. . .
“Saucy. Spicy. One hardly needs to be an experienced theater
critic for these adjectives to pop into one’s head during the prolonged opening
section of Katori Hall’s The Hot Wing King.” So asserted Brian
Scott Lipton at the top of his Theater Pizzazz review—and then added, “The other word that
popped into my critical head, however, was ‘surprising.’”
Hall . . . is usually a writer of
substance, so I didn’t expect her to simply pen an extended sitcom. And Hall doesn’t disappoint. The play suddenly makes a sharp tonal turn,
and while the laughs don’t completely disappear, much of the next two hours is
devoted to a dramatic and stunningly realistic exploration of several different
kinds of male relationships.
The TP
review-writer concluded: “Like a good hot wing, the play ends up having not
just fire, but remarkable depth and flavor, all of which is brought out to
perfection by an incredibly talented cast under Steve H. Broadnax III’s assured
direction.”
Melissa Rose Bernardo, in the first of two notices for New York Stage Review, revealed, “It
sounds hard to believe given the title, but The Hot Wing King is,
at its core, not really a play about hot wings.” Bernardo explained that “the wing-ding is
really just a pretext . . . to bring together this group of men.” The source of the drama? Bernardo affirmed that “there’s no recipe,
and there are no step-by-step instructions, for Dwayne and Cordell’s
relationship. Like the rest of us,
they’ll just have to wing it.”
In NYSR review
number two, Michael Sommers labeled the play “[f]requently a laugh out loud new
comedy,” then explained, “On its occasionally serious side, the good-natured
play considers a couple of issues that probably confront many an adult male
relationship today.” Sommers pronounced
the première “smart and sassy” and called Hall “ever-astonishing.” The second NYSR reviewer pointed out that Hall “develops the likable story” by
“cunningly entwin[ing] thoughtful matters with some fairly broad comedy.”
“A playful though ultimately sincere dramedy with an upbeat
viewpoint, dynamic characters, and a happy ending,” reported Sommers, “The
Hot Wing King is agreeably performed by a company of tiptop actors who
appear highly natural and easy in their intimate interactions.” The review-writer praised Sosa’s costumes and
found that Broadnax “has done quite a capable job in guiding his company
through the play’s changing emotional subtleties.” He concluded that the play, which he found “sweet”
and “relatively easygoing,” “delivers a worthy American story for today that is
composed, produced, and performed with considerable intelligence and charm.”
* *
* *
DUE TO THE
CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC, THE HOT WING KING ENDED ITS RUN AT THE SIGNATURE
THEATRE COMPANY ON 11 MARCH 2020
On 12 June, Julia Jacobs reported in the New York Times that the Pulitzer board has awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Drama for 2020 to Katori Hall for her play 'The Hot Wing King,' which ran at the Signature Theatre from 1 March 2020 until the theater closed down because of the coronavirus pandemic on 11 March.
ReplyDeleteSaid the New York Times:
"Katori Hall, who has told stirring stories about Black life in America both onstage and onscreen, has won the Pulitzer Prize for Drama for 'The Hot Wing King,' a family dramedy that centers on a man's quest to make award-winning chicken wings while personal conflict swirls around him.
"The Off Broadway play — which had a truncated run at Pershing Square Signature Center in 2020 — drew praise for challenging conventional conceptions of Black masculinity and fatherhood.
. . . .
"In the awards announcements on Friday [11 June], the Pulitzer board called the play a 'funny, deeply felt consideration of Black masculinity and how it is perceived, filtered through the experiences of a loving gay couple and their extended family as they prepare for a culinary competition.'"
~Rick