Showing posts with label Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. Show all posts

04 September 2026

Journalists Are Under Strain

 

[As I avowed in my last post on Rick On Theater, “Woke Art Labeled ‘Aesthetically Terrifying’“ (30 August 2026), I’m virtually a First Amendment absolutist.  I entirely believe in a free press, unfettered, uncensored, unimpeded.  In support of that position, I’m republishing the article below, “Real Life In Real Time,” a collection of short reports by actual journalists in the field about some of the difficulties they’re facing in these uncertain times. 

[The Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, the union that represents film and television actors, journalists, radio personalities, recording artists, singers, voice actors, and other media professionals worldwide, which publishes the magazine SAG-AFTRA, from which this article is drawn, is dominated by actors.  It was formed by a merger in 2012 of the Screen Actors Guild and the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists.

[All of SAG’s membership and most of AFTRA’s were actors, so the magazine’s coverage is also most often about actors and their concerns (such as AI and intimacy coordinators), even after the merger made on-air journalists and spokespeople our brothers and sisters.  The image of the union (and therefore the magazine—which used to be called Screen Actor) is inevitably actors in movies, TV, radio, and other media. 

[“Real Life In Real Time” stood out for me because it wasn’t about actors or acting, since the journalists are our colleagues—and in jeopardy.  (The union may be dominated by the actor-members, but we’re not spotlighted in the Constitution.  The journalists are.  They’re there explicitly; were only there implicitly!)

[Let’s also not forget that while the news may report on theater-movies-TV/radio, theater-movies-TV/radio is often drawn from the news (like Good Night, and Good Luck and All the President’s Men—and even the comedies like The Front Page).

[There is a long history of artists, including theater and film artists, lending their skills and power in defense of reporters’, anchors’, and editors’ freedom to do their work and to assure their safety while doing it.  In 1947, when the House Un-American Activities Committee began its witch-hunts, Hollywood icons Humphrey Bogart, Lauren Bacall, John Huston, and Gene Kelly formed the Committee for the First Amendment.  HUAC didn’t just target Hollywood screenwriters—it threatened the editorial independence of newsrooms and journalists nationwide.

[The Hollywood stars famously flew to Washington, D.C., to protest the hearings, acting as an elite shield of artistic prestige to defend the broader, fundamental right of journalists and citizens to speak and report without government persecution.

[Before All the President’s Men (1976) was a classic film, Robert Redford made a personal mission of the defense of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein’s reporting.  Redford bought the film rights to the story before the Watergate investigation was even finished or universally validated.

[At a time when the Richard Nixon administration (1969-74) was actively trying to discredit and legally crush the Washington Post, Redford used his massive Hollywood capital to legitimize, fund, and protect the narrative of investigative journalism.  He consciously used his status as an artist to build a cultural fortress around the integrity of the free press.

[As a fierce defender of free speech, former president of PEN International, Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright Arthur Miller traveled to Istanbul, Turkey, for PEN and the Helsinki Watch Committee in 1985 alongside fellow playwright (and future Nobel Laureate) Harold Pinter to investigate allegations of the military junta’s torture and persecution of writers, journalists, and political dissidents.

[The two writers held a defiant press conference at the Turkish Journalists Association headquarters which the Turkish government had authorized.  Immediately after the meeting, however, the authorities prohibited the press to report it.  Learning later that a military warrant had been issued for their arrest in Istanbul, the two dramatists rushed to the airport and flew out precipitously.

[In 1997, the Creative Coalition, an advocacy group that encourages increased support of the arts and other causes, established the Christopher Reeve First Amendment Award, given regularly to prominent figures, including journalists, who fight against censorship and defend human expression. Reeve had taken a high-profile international stand for free expression in Santiago, Chile, in 1987 at the height of the Augusto Pinochet dictatorship.

[It’s the cross-over that makes this coverage significant to me: artists standing in defense of reporters, rather than artists standing for other artists.  The amalgamation of SAG and AFTRA has concretized a symbiotic relationship that has always existed.  Protecting the truth-tellers is the only way to protect the storytellers.  It’s just like Martin Niemöller’s poem “First They Came” (see “Manifesto” in “Helen Katz Kaye Eleasari (1934-2020)“ [22 April 2022]).    

[That famous poem perfectly captures the danger of a fragmented creative community failing to see that if we don’t speak out when there’s an attack on the press, when there’s an attack on the arts, there may be no one left to speak out!]

“A LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT”
by Linda Powell

[Below is a message-cum-editorial by the Executive Vice President of SAG-AFTRA.  Published in the Spring 2026 issue (Volume 15, Number 2) of SAG-AFTRA, the union’s membership publication, it serves as a preface to the article that follows.  (Both Powell’s letter and the article, “Real Life In Real Time,” are posted in the online edition of Spring 2026.)]

“Journalists are under strain — facing regulatory uncertainty, disrespect and shrinking newsroom resources.”

Dear Member,

I’ve sat down to write this magazine letter more than once and walked away from it. Not for lack of an idea or a point of view. I know exactly the challenge I want to explore. The obstacle is that I don’t have a solution to offer. The obstacle is the obstacles.

Our world is in transition. Transitioning to who or what and when is a mystery. I spend a lot of time representing members in rooms where the dizzying changes brought on by technology, by corporate consolidation, by the fragmentation of our media sources and by the shifting political landscape are the focus of conversation. That’s true both within our union and among the wider family of labor where SAG-AFTRA gathers with siblings around the country — and around the world. These issues are universal, and while individual challenges differ, the threats are the same: threats to our wages, to our working conditions, to our benefits, to our stability, to our jobs and to unions themselves.

I am going to date myself with this: I am a radio listener. Sometimes it’s streamed (I’m not that old), but radio — especially morning radio — is my jam. Which is why, recently, when Paramount Skydance made the decision to shut down CBS News Radio, I was taken aback. [Paramount Skydance is the multinational mass media and entertainment conglomerate that owns, among other properties, Paramount Motion Picture Group and CBS Entertainment Group.]

CBS News Radio has been a standard bearer for nearly a century. It was the home of Edward R. Murrow [1908-65] — a legendary broadcaster who exemplified journalism grounded in verification, independence and public trust.

Change is the only constant, yes. I don’t expect the radio of my grandparents to exist forever. Businesses will adjust and changes will be inevitable. As distribution evolves, audiences shift. I know all too well that the members facing layoffs at CBS are not alone. Our broadcasters have become all too familiar with this pattern. We often talk about the importance of belonging to a union in terms of wages and working conditions and benefits. Just as important are the advocacy and protections that come into play when work is abruptly terminated.

But what we are witnessing goes beyond job loss. It reaches the core of how information is produced and received.

Journalists are under strain — facing regulatory uncertainty, disrespect and shrinking newsroom resources. Meanwhile, algorithms in our “news feeds” reward speed, volume and reaction over verification. In that environment, credibility becomes harder to build and easier to erode. And truth becomes hard to agree on.

Corporations once prided themselves on their news divisions. Profit was not ignored, but it was not driven at the expense of product. Today, headlines often bear no relationship to the story below the fold. In our social media environment, the news I’m seeing often bears no relationship to the news that you are seeing. Outrage bait increasingly drives our cultural conversations.

The broadcasters I stand next to have not changed; they are mission-driven and committed to hold power to account and serve the public with verified reporting. But the headwinds they face are growing stronger.

Circling back to where I started — I don’t have the answers to these obstacles. But I do know that, in this moment, supporting broadcast journalists with strong contracts, advocacy, resources and funding is not only crucial to our strength as a union, it is crucial to the health of our democracy.

In solidarity,

/s/ Linda Powell

[Linda Powell is the current Executive Vice President of SAG-AFTRA and also serves as a trustee of the SAG-AFTRA Health and SAG Pension plans.  She’s a New York-based actress who’s appeared on Broadway and off and has been seen on screen in such shows as Dopesick (miniseries; Disney+. 2021), House of Cards (TV series; Netflix, 2013-18), Chicago Fire (TV Series; NBC, 2012-present), Madam Secretary (CBS; TV series; 2014-19), Law and Order: Special Victims Unit (TV series; NBC, 1999-present), and films including The Report (Amazon Studios, 2019), I Think I Love My Wife (Fox Searchlight, 2007), and American Gangster (Universal, 2007). 

[Powell’s a proud member of Actors Equity Association and most recently enjoyed a long run as Neil Diamond’s therapist in the Broadway bio-musical A Beautiful Noise (Broadhurst Theatre, 2022-23).  

[She was a Vice Chair of the negotiating committee for SAG-AFTRA’s recently ratified TV/Theatrical contract and is Chair of the board of advisors for the Colin Powell School for Civic and Global Leadership at the City College of New York.  (Linda Powell is the daughter of Alma and Colin Powell, the former United States National Security Advisor [1987-89], Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff [1989-93], and Secretary of State [2001-05].)]

*  *  *  *
“REAL LIFE IN REAL TIME”

[Like the letter from Linda Powell posted above, the article below is from SAG-AFTRA Volume 15, Number 2 (Spring 2026).]

SAG-AFTRA BROADCASTERS PRIORITIZE SAFETY IN THE FIELD

Reporting the news doesn’t come without its obstacles. For SAG-AFTRA broadcasters who find themselves in the field reporting breaking stories live, getting the right angle or an eyewitness’s interview brings a level of personal risk — particularly during and these perilous times. 

The U.S. Press Freedom Tracker, a database established in 2017 to collect and analyze incidents in the field, reported January and February had the highest number of press freedom violations for the first two months of any year. Equipment searches and detainment by law enforcement, as well as physical assaults, are some of the tense situations news reporters experience. But other situations, such as natural disasters or standoffs involving law enforcement, can expose reporters to dangers to life and limb.

Truth-telling requires persevering in adverse circumstances. Today’s increasingly tense and volatile social and political climate has made broadcast reporting in the United States a more dangerous job than perhaps it has ever been. Here are accounts from five SAG-AFTRA broadcasters of how they stay safe — physically and mentally — so they can continue the important work of informing the public.

ALWAYS STAY READY
Anar Virji, Field Producer for Al Jazeera English 

“When I think of safety, I think about what that means for all of us working together. I encourage colleagues to speak up if they have a concern, and I plan as much as I can before we go out. That means advocating for safety and first aid training at work, and then using that to organize before you go on assignment.

“Things that I keep in my travel gear include a medical kit, a headlamp in case we lose electricity, and backup batteries to charge electronics. Then I try to think site-specific: Are we going into protests? Is it a hurricane or other weather event? What sort of access will we have to food, water and bathrooms? Will we have cellphone service? These answers come from [having] experience, talking to colleagues and speaking to people in the area.

“For protests, I’ve found that gas masks are incredibly useful safety gear. I also pack an extra foldable duffle bag to put my clothes in if I’m tear-gassed or pepper-sprayed.

“For feature stories I’ve produced, I’ve traveled to Native Alaskan and Native American villages without hotels and have slept in a school or camped. In those situations, we were also without regular cellphone service, which meant speaking with editors about when we expected to be back in range, something also essential in natural disasters.

“My strategy is always to think long-term and collectively about safety. That makes it easier, rather than thinking of it only when stories [are unfolding].”

BRINGING IN THE CAVALRY
Chip Mitchell, Reporter for WBEZ Chicago 

“I’ve had my share of hazardous reporting assignments over the years. I’ve traveled along rural Colombian highways when kidnapping for ransom was a threat. I’ve been up close to NATO summit protesters clashing with police in downtown Chicago, and on the South Side, I had reported on the city’s first widespread looting and gun violence after George Floyd’s killing [25 May 2020].

“Then, one Friday evening last September, my bosses sent me to an ICE processing facility, just west of Chicago, as President Trump’s deportation blitz was hitting high gear. A couple hundred protesters were chanting and jeering at ICE and U.S. Border Patrol agents. I saw feds responding with pepper balls, tear gas, chemical sprays and stun grenades. ‘Stinger’ [a tactical, “less-lethal” crowd-control weapon explicitly designed to explode and spray dozens of small rubber projectiles] detonations showered the crowd with rubber pellets.

“My employer, a nonprofit that owns a public radio station and major newspaper, was starting to outfit its reporters and photographers with gas masks, goggles, helmets, vests, decontamination wipes and so on. I had what I needed that night. I knew [when] to step back and avoid getting caught between the protesters and agents.

“But I faced a safety challenge the equipment and positioning could not address. Once the agents started using the riot-control weapons, the event became big news. I was expected to supply reports to the radio station, its national network, the newspaper, two websites and a live blog. That would be challenging under the best of circumstances, but especially on a night when [there weren’t] many editors on duty. So, I didn’t get much help prioritizing the news outlets and deadlines — not to mention making decisions about sourcing and safety risks.

“I had to spend a lot of time thumbing around on my phone, trying to rustle up off-duty editors and begging for coordination. The phone work required looking down at the device when I should have been looking up and devoting my full attention to things like protester arrests and teargas canisters.

“I didn’t get hurt. Over the next few days, though, I let newsroom managers know they had dropped the ball on editor staffing that night, that it hurt our coverage and that it could have jeopardized my safety.

“One thing I appreciated was having a union. We had organized a SAG-AFTRA unit at the radio station a decade earlier. During those conversations with bosses, I knew that the union would have my back if I needed it. That support strengthened my confidence to communicate clearly with management.”

[WBEZ is a non-commercial educational radio station in Chicago.  It’s the National Public Radio news outlet in the city.]

SAFETY IS MORE THAN A WORD
Frankie McLister, Reporter for WCCO-TV, CBS News Minnesota

“‘Safety is the No. 1 priority’ sounds quite cliché — but to me, it’s cliché for a reason. As a reporter in Minneapolis, I’ve been tested to keep this phrase at the forefront of my mind, especially throughout our coverage of Operation Metro Surge, the nearly two-month-long surge of 3,000 federal agents to the state [4 December 2025-12 February 2026].

“At all times, I have the proper gear. This includes pepper spray in every bag I keep handy, in the side compartment of my vehicle and, sometimes, right in my pocket during a live shot. Additionally, I often find myself communicating with my photojournalist and security guard (if one is provided — though in general, we’ve had a lot of security assistance during large-scale news events). I tell them I’m watching their backs, and this prompts them to keep safety at the forefront and reinforces that I view [the work] as a team effort.

“When I say I’m always watching — I’m truly always watching. And I think it’s important to communicate that. My badge is on hand, and I’m also mindful of what I’m wearing and where I’m wearing it. For example, if I’m in a part of town with a higher crime rate, I might choose not to wear my shiny watch.

“Once you keep the lines of communication open and make safety your first priority, it becomes natural. My goggles were already around my neck while covering several events involving tear gas — and that’s when I knew it was no longer a second thought, just like a seatbelt in the car.”

TEAMWORK REMAINS WHEN TRAGEDY ENDS
Annie Rose Ramos, General Assignment Reporter for KTLA 5 News

“In Los Angeles, SAG-AFTRA members at KTLA [television station in Los Angeles, California] have partnered with station management to address field safety concerns during contract negotiations with Nexstar [multimedia conglomerate founded in 1996, the largest television broadcasting company in the United States, owning 265 television stations]. In the aftermath of the devastating wildfires in 2025 [7-31 January] . . . conditions were unpredictable in the field.

“For days, the ground was still smouldering [sic; British spelling]. In the weeks [afterward], the air was difficult to breathe. For months, toxic debris lay on the ground. As field teams, we wanted to ensure we were being mindful of the health impacts, working with our station to create kits that included hazmat suits, goggles, masks and water.

“We continued to remain proactive when it concerned the hazardous area so many neighborhoods had become in the wake of the wildfires. Backyards had broken branches. Power lines were down and snaked along the streets. Electric car batteries were melted into the ashes and rubble. It was about watching where you walked, where you turned, what you touched. Managers at our station knew that, too. They kept a watchful eye, and if we didn’t see something that could pose a risk, they did — they called us and advised us to move locations. It was about teamwork, and continues to be, to ensure safety.”

CLARITY, DOCUMENTATION AND DISCIPLINE
JJ Green, National Security Correspondent for WTOP

“Disinformation is not abstract. It is kinetic.

“In heated political seasons, lies do not simply distort facts, they weaponize audiences. When a journalist is falsely labeled a traitor, partisan operative, foreign agent or enemy of the people, that narrative does not stay online. It migrates. It hardens. It radicalizes. And eventually, it can show up in a parking lot, outside a home or at a crowded public event.

“We have seen the progression. Smear campaigns escalate into coordinated harassment. Harassment metastasizes into doxxing [publishing the private personal information of someone or revealing the identity of an online poster without the consent of that individual; also doxing]. Doxxing produces stalking. And stalking can become violence. The risk matrix for journalists now includes physical surveillance, targeted intimidation, online swatting [causing a SWAT team (from Special Weapons and Tactics, a military-like unit within U.S. police forces) to be deployed on an unsuspecting victim, especially a public figure or someone prominent on social media by falsifying a threat, often as a punishment or retaliation] attempts and threats amplified by algorithmic outrage cycles. Disinformation collapses the distinction between rhetoric and action.

“For national security reporters, especially those covering intelligence, war, extremism or political corruption, the danger compounds. False narratives are designed to delegitimize professional reporting. They seek to isolate the journalist from the public, to frame truth-telling as treachery, and to create a permissive environment for intimidation.

“The first countermeasure is narrowing the firehose [the massive, relentless, and overwhelming flood of false information and online provocations used by manipulators], refusing to react to every provocation and denying manipulators oxygen. The second is discipline and documentation, maintaining rigorous transparency in reporting to inoculate against narrative distortion. The third is threat awareness, monitoring online chatter patterns, recognizing coordinated amplification and understanding when rhetoric crosses into credible risk. Finally, resilience, both psychological and procedural. Calm is a defensive tool. Emotional reactivity is an exploitable vulnerability.

“Disinformation thrives on fear, anger and spectacle. My defense is clarity, documentation and discipline.

“Because in a season where lies travel faster than light, survival, professional and physical, depends on refusing to let them control the battlefield.”

[WTOP is an all-news radio station in Washington, D.C.]

MAKING CHANGE WHERE HISTORY IS TOLD
Bob Butler’s Story

Journalists have always faced challenges in the field, but safety has become a greater concern as public demonstrations became more commonplace, said SAG-AFTRA Vice President, Broadcasters, Bob Butler, a veteran reporter in radio and television. 

“I worked at KCBS Radio in San Francisco for 42 years,” said Butler, who retired in 2023. “As a reporter, I never had to worry about my personal safety until the Oscar Grant riots in 2010 [following the police shooting on 1 January 2009] and Occupy Wall Street Demonstrations in 2011 [17 September-15 November]. The most difficult times are during protests and demonstrations, especially when [people] start marching. The danger came mostly from being in crowds that were hit by police tear gas.”

In the field, Butler’s Golden Rule was to employ the buddy system with himself and his fellow crewmate, often a photographer, or, when working alone, to stay with other journalists in a group. In the newsroom, bringing attention to safety risks led to advocating for more safety precautions.    

“The AFTRA [nb: these events predate the 2012 SAG-AFTRA merger] local staff instituted safety briefings that included news reporter members, management, photographers, leadership from the technical unions and law enforcement. These meetings led to best practices designed to keep crews safe,” said Butler. “A couple of the steps that were taken here in San Francisco were for television stations to hire security guards for their news crew [and] purchase cameras with tracking devices.”

Still, Butler points to a need for the concern for broadcasters to be shared across the board. 

“Broadcast journalists face a number of challenges from political leaders, ambivalent managers and an increasingly skeptical electorate. Adding threats to our personal safety makes our job of providing information to keep the public informed even more difficult.”


02 June 2026

Harrison Ford, SAG-AFTRA Life Achievement Recipient

 

[On Sunday, 1 March 2026, at the Shrine Auditorium and Expo Hall in Los Angeles, the 32nd Annual Actor Awards (known until November 2025 as the Screen Actors Guild Awards) were presented.  That was also the occasion for the presentation (by actor Woody Harrelson [b. 1961]) of the 2025 SAG-AFTRA Life Achievement Award.  

[This year’s recipient, the 61st, is actor Harrison Ford, the first to be honored with the newly renamed award. (Up through last year, the award was called the SAG Life Achievement Award because it was originated by the Screen Actors Guild before the 2012 merger with the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists.)

[The SAG-AFTRA Life Achievement Award is the highest honor bestowed by the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, the media professionals’ union, given annually to a performer who fosters the “finest ideals of the acting profession” through career accomplishments and humanitarian work. 

[The honoree is nominated and chosen by the SAG-AFTRA National Honors and Tributes Committee. The award celebrates lifelong dedication to the craft and society.  To qualify, a candidate must be a well-established performer who has improved the image of the acting profession and maintained active involvement in humanitarian or public service endeavors. 

[Two previous recipients of the award, whose careers have been profiled on Rick On Theater, are Barbra Streisand (17 September 2024), the 59th awardee, and Jane Fonda (22 March 2025), the 60th.] 

“HARRISON FORD: HERO OF OUR HEARTS”

[This Harrison Ford profile appeared in the membership magazine SAG-AFTRA (15.2 – Spring 2026).  It was followed by an interview of Ford by the union president, Sean Astin, which I have also reposted below.]

“I was not an overnight success. I struggled for about 15 years, going from acting jobs to carpentry and back to acting, until I finally got a part in a wildly successful film. None of this happened on my own.”

These simple words from 61st SAG-AFTRA Life Achievement Award recipient Harrison Ford [b. 1942], delivered to a room of his fellow actors during The 32nd Annual Actor Awards Presented by SAG-AFTRA, were fitting and expected of an actor whose decades of work have been the blueprint for today’s modern movie hero. Simple yet humble, with special words of thanks and a life’s worth of gratitude to longtime colleagues in the industry, those few sentences showed the audience and viewers exactly what makes Ford something of a hero among his peers: an individual whose screen work and real life retain their own standard of excellence.

THE UNDERDOG

Once upon a time, the Academy Award- and Golden Globe-nominated performer, now 83, was anything but an A-lister. First came his expulsion [for plagiarism, four days before graduation] from Ripon College in Wisconsin — where he enrolled in his first acting class. A short time later, he was dropped from a contract with Columbian [see anecdote in following article] and, after being limited to small roles, left his Universal contract early in search of better opportunities. It was his self-taught vocation of carpentry that enabled him to continue auditioning in Hollywood and instilled within him the long-held values that have enabled him to become exalted in his profession: self-direction, steadfastness, concentration and perseverance.

His work on George Lucas’ American Graffiti in 1973 followed what was already a decade of other onscreen performances. But it was also a step in the right direction, because what came a few years later, in 1976, changed the trajectory of Ford’s career: another chance meeting with Lucas [b. 1944]. One that turned into a favor helping read lines for the director’s upcoming sci-fi production — a little thing called Star Wars [1977], which went on to gross over $410 million at the box office during its theatrical release.

Maybe you’ve heard of Han Solo?

Or perhaps you’re more familiar with another role that came a few years later. That one was for another action film for another director — a guy named Steven Spielberg [b. 1946]. It was called Raiders of the Lost Ark [1981], and it grossed nearly $390 million in theaters.

What started as a career with the odds stacked against him has turned into decades of successes in Ford’s toolbelt.

THE (SOMETIMES) HERO

If Ford’s career has ever been regarded as a stroke of luck, his work in the years following the late ’70s and early ’80s serves to prove any naysayer wrong. He’s played a hero or other “good guy” across genres — Rick Deckard in Ridley Scott’s [b. 1937] futuristic masterpiece Blade Runner [1982]; Detective John Book in the crime thriller Witness [1985; Peter Weir (b. 1944)]; President James Marshall in the action film Air Force One [1997; Wolfgang Petersen (1941-2022)]; and playboy-turned-romantic lead Linus Larrabee in the 1995 film adaptation of Sabrina [Sydney Pollack (1934-2008)].

But what’s made him a favorite among moviegoers and earned him the Golden Globe’s Cecil B. DeMille Award [2002], the Life Achievement Award from the American Film Institute [2000], the Cannes Film Festival’s Honorary Palme d’Or [2023] and a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame [2003] has been the performances themselves. What Ford has always demonstrated is an understanding of the human spirit that goes beyond surface level. Hidden within the snappy one-liners and scruffy looks of his most notable roles has always been a performer with an innate knowledge of people: their honesty and deceit; their reluctance and sense of responsibility. It’s the times when he gives The Chosen One a helpful push in the right direction — and follows his own advice — that makes him a hero of the galaxy. It’s the moment he sees the half-human fugitives he’s meant to hunt as something more, and whole, that propels a sci-fi flick into a seminal work of the genre.

Ford’s humanist approach is all the more compelling in roles where he’s gone against Hollywood’s expectations and played the villain. Whether it’s been as the manipulative husband Dr. Norman Spencer in What Lies Beneath [Robert Zemeckis (b. 1951); 2000] or the obsessive patriarch Allie Fox in The Mosquito Coast [Peter Weir; 1986], what makes those moments of betrayal and disaster all the more memorable to audiences is everything that happens before. The scenes where his characters shift from their most charming, doting and morally upright to manipulative, controlling and abusive.

“I [perform] because it’s what I want to do; what I know how to do,” said Ford in a 1997 interview with Charlie Rose. “It’s where I feel the most engaged, challenged and useful. There’s nothing that I do that stimulates me more, scares me and engages me as much as making movies.”

Yet Ford has found just as much success on the small screen. Having previously guest-starred on TV shows such as Gunsmoke [1972, 1973; CBS], The Mod Squad [1968; ABC] and Ironside [1967; NBC], he has gained praise for his two most recent television projects, Yellowstone prequel 1923 [15 episodes, 2023, 2025; Paramount+] and, most notably, Shrinking [33 episodes, 2023, 2024, 2026; Apple TV+]. Both projects have allowed Ford to continue to demonstrate his range for making his characters feel as noble as any gunslinging lawman of the Wild West or as familiar as that one guy in the office who everybody knows.

As the Dutton family patriarch, Jacob, in 1923, Ford’s performances come with fire in his eyes and grit in his voice. But while his sheriff’s badge glints silver, the man underneath is shown to be desperate to keep his family’s livelihood and town from falling into chaos. On the other end of the spectrum, therapist Dr. Paul Rhoades [Ford’s character in Shrinking] is a role where Ford uses improvisation and embodies a gruff, “straight man” brand of humor.

Yet, it’s the tender moments, when his character is shown to enjoy spending time with his doctor-turned-girlfriend or battling with the increasing symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease that stay with viewers. Season two, episode 12 [24 December 2024], “The Last Thanksgiving,” is a certified fan favorite, and Ford’s work on the show earned him a first-time Screen Actors Guild Awards® nomination for Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Comedy Series in 2025.

If good things get better over time, then Ford’s six decades of work prove the old adage is especially true with good storytelling. With experience and a willingness to explore and test one’s own boundaries comes a unique talent: an ability to let audiences be in awe about the best and worst embodiment of a person without judgment.

“I found a calling, a life in storytelling; an identity in pretending to be other people. The work I do with other actors is one of the great joys of my life. My career is built on their work, as well as the work of writers, directors and every single cast member — every crew member I’ve ever been on the set with. I’ve had incredible collaborators every step of the way, and being able to deliver the work we create together to an audience is an honor and a privilege. . . . [Through it] I’ve come to know myself,” said Ford.

THE HUMAN ABOVE ALL

As well-known as Ford is for his professional work, his life away from the limelight is as dynamic as his most heroic portrayals.

The urban legends surrounding his life as a carpenter are quite well-known to fans. Ford is just as famously known as a real-life pilot and has volunteered for many search-and-rescue efforts. Additionally, his early knowledge of the wilderness, stemming from both a love of nature and early years spent as a Boy Scout, has developed into tireless advocacy for environmental causes both in the United States and abroad, including his delivery of testimony before the United Nations Climate Summit for forest and ocean conservation. In 2018, Ford was a recipient of the SAG-AFTRA Foundation’s Artist Inspiration Award for what was then 25 years of service to environmental nonprofit Conservation International, as well as his longtime commitment as a member of the SAG-AFTRA Foundation’s Actors’ Council.  

In the end, it may be that Ford will be remembered as a person who chose for both his life and career the responsibility of advocacy, both for his fellow actors and the world.

Said SAG-AFTRA President Sean Astin [b. 1971] of the Life Achievement Award honoree, “Harrison Ford is a singular presence in American life; an actor whose iconic characters have shaped world culture. His career has been endlessly exciting, always returning to his love of acting. We are honored to celebrate a legend whose impact on our craft is indelible.”

Nominated and voted on by the SAG-AFTRA National Honors and Tributes Committee, the Life Achievement Award is awarded annually at the Actor Awards. Considered the union’s highest honor, the award is bestowed to those whose professional and philanthropic contributions bring prestige to the craft of acting and attention to public service efforts. Ford is the awards’ 61st recipient.

*  *  *  *
“HARRISON FORD & THE LIFE OF A WORKING ACTOR”
 

[This “Actor to Actor” interview of Ford by Sean Astin appeared in the membership magazine SAG-AFTRA 15.2 (Spring 2026).]

The 61st Life Achievement Honoree Joins SAG-AFTRA President Sean Astin for an Impactful Actor to Actor Interview

Harrison Ford believes in work. He prefers the term “working actor” over “icon” and attests to the power of “putting the work in” in order to be a professional. The result of Ford’s dedication to craft has been his legacy as a performer exalted in the profession. Following the announcement that he was selected to be the 61st SAG-AFTRA Life Achievement Award honoree, Ford sat down with SAG-AFTRA President Sean Astin for an Actor to Actor interview. The following is an abridged version of their conversation that took place on Feb. 4.

SEAN ASTIN: Mr. Ford, Welcome to the SAG-AFTRA headquarters. And congratulations on being this year’s recipient of the Life Achievement Award.

HARRISON FORD: Thank you very much.

ASTIN: I looked up the word “iconic.” [That was] my first thought when they told me they wanted to see if you would accept this award. I thought, “Well he’s iconic.” Can you live with the word “iconic”?

FORD: No, I’d really rather live with the words “working actor.”

ASTIN: So a lot of our performers are in the audition process. It’s all about auditioning on videotape from home — the self tape. And it’s turned into a great convenience. And it makes me think about the contract time; when you’re doing all those auditions under contract.

FORD: Well, the best thing about being under contract is they never put me up for anything I had to audition for.

ASTIN: So that’s it? You’re in the rotation and you just . . .

FORD: Well, because my part often was nothing more than, “Mr. Jones? Paging Mr. Jones. Mr. Jones?” I was under contract at Columbia Pictures for seven years. The first thing they put me in, I was able to remember all the lines of the character I played: a bellboy [Dead Heat on a Merry-Go-Round, 1966; uncredited]. And I was summoned to the office of the executive of Columbia Pictures that was in charge of the new talent program. He said, “You’re never gonna make it in this business.” And this is on the basis of delivering a telegram. And he said, “Let me tell you a story.” He said, “The first time Tony Curtis was ever in a movie, he delivered a bag of groceries. You took one look at that guy and you say, ‘That’s a movie star.’” I leaned across the desk and said, “I thought you were supposed to think that that was a grocery delivery boy.” He said, “Get the eff out of here.” And I did.

ASTIN: Some actors carry with them self-doubt.

FORD: I can carry both. I mean, I carried both. I carried a belief that I would learn to do this. But a belief also that it was a really hard space to own, and many people were not as successful as they wanted to be in the choice of that as a career. But I was not easily dissuaded. Partially, because I thought that it would take time, and that I was learning . . . To be frank, it was a difficult time in my life. I had kids, and I was struggling with money. But it was a job and I was glad to have it.

ASTIN: I remember Witness. When it came out, I was younger and thinking “Oh, that’s what an actor [does]. You were committed to being an actor. That meant something to me.”

FORD: Well, having seen what you’ve done, I appreciate that very much.

ASTIN: I was in a film trilogy [The Ring Trilogy (2001, 2002, 2003)] . . . There were a thousand moments where the director Peter Jackson would talk about the audience. “This is what I want the audience to be feeling. This is what the audience is thinking.” And I never thought of it like that. I wonder, has that ever been a part of your . . .

FORD: Oh, yeah. I think I’m always aware of the audience and wanting to bring them along. I want to create an experience for them . . . I work for them. That’s my job. And I think about the clarity of what we’re doing. I think about the energy of what we’re doing. I think about the emotion that we’re hoping to create.

ASTIN: You’ve talked [about loving] the process of filming. And I think a lot of actors, maybe many actors, don’t have those conversations with the filmmaker or the screenwriter.

FORD: Then that’s a shame. It’s often unfortunate that an actor comes into a project and doesn’t get a fair share of the director’s attention. Especially actors without a lot of experience.

ASTIN: Well, that’s — I was going to say counterintuitive. But I guess that makes sense that people without a lot of experience would need more of that.

FORD: Not necessarily need more advice, but I think it helps to feel that the director is somehow connected to what you’re doing. And it’s not just an incidental moment, but that it means something. That’s the only way you know what to do. It’s your concept of what the task is. When you say that line, what is the intention that the writer had in mind? What is it you’re hoping to elicit from the audience? What are you feeling? Are you really there? Or is the character really there in that moment? All of those things. It would help to know that the director notices what you’re doing . . . I remember coming in at the beginning of my career, coming onto a set and just feeling like I didn’t belong there. Not knowing how to behave really.

It is often the case that you develop a relationship with the director that is open and fruitful. And there are other cases where that’s not part of his skill necessarily, or not part of your skill, but you still have to attend to the story and your character’s responsibility in the telling of the story. So you can do without that, but it helps to have a little feeling of being accepted, being appreciated.

ASTIN: What I hear you describing is fundamental humility. There must be some kind of discipline you have to have not to abuse it. Or are you just saying, “Hey, no, this is this project. This is this story. These are these characters.”

FORD: You may have a different concept than the director. And you may persist in that concept, as I did with Ridley Scott in Blade Runner, famously. He had a very different idea of the character than what I felt was necessary to drive that character for myself. I had to believe that I was human. Ridley insisted on believing I was replicant, and that I would know it. I said, “I cannot communicate from that point, that place.” I would think that I’m human.

ASTIN: All right, so this is an award being presented to you by a union which you have been a member of [since 1966].

FORD: It’s such a hard thing to be a professional actor. From the very beginning, it’s impossible. And then there’s a crack, and you get a job, and you become a member of the union. And that’s a big, big deal because then you have the support of the union. You have insurance, you have someone speaking for you to the bosses . . . I would never say I was an actor until I was being paid for it. Now that’s my little twist of mind, because that doesn’t really make sense.

ASTIN: Sure it does. Professional. When you’re a professional, you're getting paid for it.

FORD: Yeah, but if you don’t have what an actor needs, you’re not an actor, even if you’re getting paid for it. I mean, it’s a spirit. It’s a diagnosis too. It’s a complicated thing. The thing is that you can’t do it alone. You have to be employed. You have to be in the company of other actors. You can do it for free, but you have to feel like it’s important. You have to feel committed to it and to make it real.

ASTIN: This is a big moment right now for the industry. The culture has changed and the business.

FORD: The business has changed remarkably. And we don’t have the support of movie theaters as much as we used to have. And that is a damn shame. That community experience produces positive effects in the culture. We’ve been disaggregated into serviceable economic units, but there’s not the general feeling of community that we used to have when movies had captured the zeitgeist. They were needed. And they were telling a story that was needed. And that story was a positive contribution to the culture.

ASTIN: It’s still possible. You’re doing it. You’re breaking through [and] reaching other people.

FORD: You’re not in a dark room with people that you don’t know and who you begin to know because you experience a common humanity. That’s a very powerful effect.

ASTIN: I grew to know you in many movies. [It’s an] absolute lifetime achievement for me to get to sit here and interview you.

FORD: Appreciate it.

ASTIN: Much love to you. From all the actors, thank you.


23 March 2026

Verticals


From the 1950s to the 1980s, we had essentially three networks dominating our television landscape: ABC, CBS, and NBC.  In 1986, Fox Broadcasting joined the Big 3, but we still had over-the-air broadcasters for our TV content providers. 

Then, in the early 1980s, cable TV broke into the market when CNN, MTV, ESPN, and some other specialized channels began providing service.  In the early 2000s, online streaming services branched out from traditional broadcast, giving audiences exponentially more platforms on which to find the latest television show.  By 2022, streaming viewership officially exceeded cable usage in the U.S.

Now, a new form of TV-viewing has arisen, and it’s not on a television at all, or even on a computer screen—but on our cell phones.

Verticals or vertical productions, also known as vertical shorts, micro-dramas, mini-dramas, verts, and more, are short, serialized stories filmed in a 9:16 portrait format specifically designed for mobile viewing on platforms like TikTok, Instagram Reels, and dedicated apps like ReelShort and DramaBox. 

For comparison, at this point in 2026, micro-drama viewers in the United States number 28 million; traditional streaming platforms attract a little over 200 million watchers; the cable/pay-TV viewers number 50-60 million households (not individual viewers); and the number of “non-pay TV” households (over-the-air viewers) is projected to reach 80.7 million by the end of 2026.

A vertical drama is defined as an online audiovisual program consisting of 60 to 100 episodes with each one running from several dozen seconds to about 15 minutes.  Each episode features a clear theme and the main storyline is continuous and forms a complete narrative arc.

The most successful verticals feature episodes from 1 to 2 minutes long.  A complete series typically runs between 90 and 180 minutes, compared to 120 to 150 minutes for a feature film or 60 minutes for a standard episode of a traditional U.S. television series.

Along with several other characteristics (which I’ll enumerate shortly), the format of verticals is distinguished by its structure as an episodic series and its narrative-driven dramatic form from other short-form videos online such as brief clips of people’s daily activities such as vlogs; how-to’s or tutorials like tips, recipes, or educational shortcuts; or videos based on popular music, “hashtags,” or specific physical challenges.

Furthermore, the narrative style is purposely dynamic and intense.  Unlike most content on platforms such as TikTok, micro-dramas are professionally produced with paid writers, actors, and crew (which accounts for the interest among unions like WGA and SAG-AFTRA).

Just as the episodes are fast-paced, so is production.  Joy Quinn, co-owner of 9:16 Productions of Kansas City, Missouri, where she’s also a producer, the artistic director, and the production designer, laid out the process:

Vertical productions are quite unique in structure and timeline.  Pre-production typically lasts 3-4 weeks, filming takes 6-9 days (rarely more than 12), and post-production wraps up within 1-2 months. . . .  Although the total runtime equals that of a typical feature film, verticals are broken into short episodes—each lasting just about 1 to 1.5 minutes.  Viewers scroll through the episodes rapidly, completing the series in one quick burst.

According to the conservative British daily newspaper The Telegraph, a Los Angeles talent agent declared: “They’re cheap and fast and nothing to be proud of—but they’re good work for young actors, despite the lousy pay.”  Critics and regulators have registered concerns over the micro-dramas’ content.

Criticisms include relying too heavily on sensationalism, exploiting viewer emotions, and potential manipulation of susceptible viewers, say, ones who don’t understand the way vertical producers let them buy “extras” without leaving the app (that is, “in-app purchases”).      

This entertainment sector is growing so fast that SAG-AFTRA, the U.S. labor union that represents media professionals (including actors, announcers, dancers, singers, stunt performers, voice-over artists, and others) worldwide, launched a “Verticals Agreement” in October 2025 to regulate the field.  (I won’t get into the specifics of the guild’s contract; aside from the webpage, there’s also a YouTube video featuring Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator of SAG-AFTRA, and Sean Astin, President.)

(In September 2025, the Writers Guild of America, the two American labor unions—WGA East and WGA West—representing writers in film, television, radio, and online media, reminded its members that writing for verticals or micro-dramas is covered by existing agreements.)

This field of video art is new to me; I only first heard of it when I received an e-mail from SAG-AFTRA announcing the new agreement.  I had to look “verticals” up to see what they are, and I’m going to try to describe it for any ROTters who share my unfamiliarity.  If any or all of this is already within your knowledge and/or experience, just chalk it up to the ramblings of an old geezer who’s chronically out of touch.

Verticals are bite-sized episodes meant for mobile, vertical viewing, primarily on smartphones.  They got their start in China during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-23) but starting around 2023, have expanded to the U.S., where revenues reached $1.3 billion in 2025, and are projected to rise to $3.8 billion by 2030.

The rapid growth in the U.S. is one of the primary reasons major Hollywood entities like Fox Entertainment and Disney have begun investing in vertical platforms or launching their own vertical-content divisions. 

Other major players are entering the space as well, including former Miramax boss Bill Block with the platform GammaTime and the launch of the dedicated vertical studio Knockout Shorts.

The video’s portrait orientation originated in China and was designed to fill the whole screen of a smartphone held upright because producers found that audiences on platforms like ReelShort or TikTok don’t want to rotate their phones. 

While tablets, as well as wearables, like smartwatches, and handheld gaming consoles can connect to the internet and play videos, smartphones are the primary device for vertical content.  This is because micro-dramas are designed for people holding a device vertically with one hand, the way they already use their phones for texting or scrolling, and for which a phone is optimized, but which is awkward with a tablet. 

Even though a tablet is “mobile,” it has much more screen real estate.  If you watch a 9:16 vertical drama on a tablet held horizontally (that is, in landscape mode), you’ll see large black bars (or “mattes”) on each side of the video, defeating the “immersive” purpose of the format.

So, although in a general tech sense ‘mobile’ refers to any handheld, battery-powered computing device designed for portability, in the context of verticals, producers use ‘mobile’ as shorthand for “the vertical screen in your pocket.”

Producers use the vertical drama’s dimensions to ensure the content feels “native” and “immersive.”  These terms have to do with the way the story is built specifically for the phone, rather than just being “shrunk down” from a TV screen.

“Native,” which is about the technical fit (it feels right on the device), refers to content that feels like it belongs on a smartphone naturally.  It follows the “media language” of the device.  The producer ensures that the human eye is focused entirely on the content.

As I noted earlier, it’s designed to be watched while holding the phone vertically in one hand, matching how it’s already used.  Non-native content—like a horizontal movie clipped for TikTok—often has distracting mattes at the top and bottom.  It respects the user’s habit of scrolling because many micro-dramas include interactive elements or “next episode” buttons positioned exactly where your thumb naturally rests.

“Immersive,” which is about the emotional grip (it feels like you are right there with the character), describes the feeling of being pulled directly into the story’s world, often through techniques that make the screen feel like a window rather than a distant display. 

Because, for instance, the portrait frame is narrow, the camera stays very close to the actors’ faces.  This creates an intense, “moving portrait” effect that feels more personal and intimate than traditional wide-screen cinema.  Characters in vertical dramas often look directly into the lens, making it feel as if they are addressing the viewers directly or speaking to them privately. 

By filling the entire vertical screen—which viewers usually hold quite close to their faces—the production blocks out the surrounding physical world, heightening the emotional impact of the drama’s cliffhangers and twists.

The typical episode length of a micro-drama is 1 to 3 minutes, often featuring high-drama suspense to encourage binge-watching.  The series rely on melodramatic tropes—secret romances, revenge arcs, identity-reveal plots, supernatural and fantasy storylines, family drama, and high stakes ventures. 

The first few episodes are usually free, but if a viewer wants to see more, he or she’ll have to pay—buying digital “coins” or passes from the apps (the “in-app purchase”) to watch additional content.  That can cost viewers $10 to $20 a week or up to $80 a month.

Because viewers must pay or watch an ad (a trade of time for content where viewers can unlock the next hook without paying money by sitting through a 30-second video advertisement) to unlock the next 60 seconds, the vertical dramas rely on a narrative structure where every minute must end on a high-stakes emotional beat, a “vertical cliffhanger.” 

Without describing verticals as addictive, one viewer said the stories can suck you in.  After seeing TikTok ads for the ReelShort micro-drama series True Heiress vs. Fake Queen Bee, she watched it and then purchased a pass to finish the 85-part series.

“Despite the cheesy acting, the clip ended on a cliffhanger, and I desperately wanted to see what happened next,” said the viewer.  This viewer pronounced verticals “my generation’s soap opera.”

“The stories are outrageous, and the dialogue is very two-dimensional,” said Ryan Luevano, owner/talent manager of Skyfire Artists, a Los Angeles talent management company, of micro-dramas.  “This isn’t Shakespeare, but it’s also not what it’s about.  It’s the modern-day soap opera.  They’re written for Gen Z, and they’re consuming them on TikTok and Instagram and all these other platforms.”

Some observers, however, like Caiwei Chen, a tech reporter who covers China for MIT Technology Review, question whether micro-dramas are merely a viral curiosity.  “I do worry about how soon people will get tired of it,” she offered.  “It’s competing with TikTok . . . It’s competing with Instagram and a lot of other stuff.”

[In my reading on verticals and micro-dramas, I came across a post on the eponymous blog of Gary Mason, who describes himself as “a working actor and SAG-AFTRA member. I also help other actors . . . figure out this business without making all the mistakes I made.”  He lays out the newly union-sanctioned field of verticals for those in the biz who might be contemplating giving it a go.  I decided it’d made a good afterword for my post, so here’s what he has to say:

“VERTICAL MINI-DRAMAS:
FROM TIKTOK TREND TO SAG-COVERED WORK”
by Gary Mason
23 September 2025

Remember when vertical video was just for Instagram stories and shaky concert footage? Yeah, that changed.

Vertical mini-dramas . . . those addictive, phone-shot serialized shows you’ve probably seen your kids (or grandkids) binge-watching . . . have gone from viral curiosity to legitimate industry. And as of October 2025, SAG-AFTRA has a contract for them.

Which means union actors can now work these productions with full protections.

If you’ve been wondering whether this vertical thing is worth paying attention to . . . the answer just became “probably yes.”

Wait, What ARE Vertical Mini-Dramas?

If you haven’t stumbled across them yet, here’s the quick version.

Vertical mini-dramas (also called micro-dramas) are short, serialized shows shot in portrait mode . . . the way you hold your phone. Episodes run 1-3 minutes each, often with cliffhangers that keep you swiping to the next one. Think soap operas meets TikTok.

They started in China during the pandemic and EXPLODED. We’re talking $819 million in U.S. revenue in 2024. Projections say $3.8 billion by 2030. In China, micro-drama revenue is expected to surpass theatrical box office this year.

Platforms like ReelShort, DramaBox, and various TikTok-native productions are pumping these out constantly. And they need actors.

The SAG-AFTRA Verticals Agreement

In October 2025, SAG-AFTRA launched the Verticals Agreement . . . a new contract specifically designed for this format.

Here’s what you need to know:

What it covers: Serialized micro-dramas shot in vertical (9:16) format with budgets under $300,000.

Why it matters: Union actors can now work these productions with protections. Before this, it was a gray area . . . or you were working non-union.

Typical pay: Lead actors are averaging around $500/day, according to Backstage. Not life-changing money, but real work.

The bigger picture: SAG-AFTRA president Sean Astin called this an “exciting new space” and said the union is “meeting the moment.” When the union creates a whole new contract category for something, that’s a signal.

This isn’t replacing traditional TV and film work. It’s adding a new lane. And for actors in regional markets like mine . . . where we’re not swimming in major productions . . . more lanes is good news.

Should YOU Care About This?

Honest answer: it depends on where you are. 

If you’re still figuring out whether acting is for you . . . don’t worry about this yet. Get your fundamentals in place first. Headshots. A basic reel. Profiles on the casting platforms. Learn how to self-tape. THEN start thinking about specialized formats.

If that’s you, my free guide “Start Where You Are” at gary-mason.com covers the mindset and first steps before you spend money on anything.

If you’re actively submitting and building your career . . . this is worth paying attention to. Not because you need to drop everything and chase micro-dramas, but because:

      1.      It’s real, paid, union-covered work
2.      Casting for these productions is happening NOW
3.      Having vertical content in your reel shows you’re current
4.      The market is growing fast . . . getting in early has advantages

If you’re a character actor or play “types” . . . micro-dramas LOVE distinct, memorable faces. The melodramatic style actually works well for bigger performances. This might be a better fit than you’d expect.

Adding Vertical Clips to Your Reel

Even if you’re not chasing micro-drama roles specifically, having a vertical clip or two in your materials signals something to casting: this person understands where the industry is going. 

You don’t need fancy equipment. You need:

  • Your phone (shoot in 4K if it supports it)
  • A way to mount it vertically (cheap tripod adapters work fine)
  • Decent lighting (window light or a simple LED panel . . . no ring lights)
  • Clean audio (a $20 lav mic makes a huge difference)

Keep it simple. A 60-90 second scene that shows you can perform in this format. Tight framing . . . your face should dominate the frame. That’s the whole point of vertical.

I cover reel building, self-tape setup, and how to present yourself to casting in “Beyond the Basics” at gary-mason.com. If you’re at the stage where you’re actively submitting and want to make sure your materials are working for you, that’s where to look.

What to Actually Shoot

If you’re creating a vertical clip for your reel, think about what shows you off:

For drama: A confrontation scene. Tight on your face. Emotion building. These formats reward intensity . . . don’t be subtle.

For comedy: Setup, complication, punchline. Reaction shots work great in vertical because you’re RIGHT THERE in the viewer’s face.

For either: Keep it under 90 seconds. Front-load the good stuff. If casting is scrolling through reels, they’re deciding in the first few seconds whether to keep watching.

One or two solid vertical clips is plenty. You’re not replacing your horizontal reel . . . you’re supplementing it.

The Bottom Line

A year ago, I would have told you vertical mini-dramas were an interesting trend but not something to prioritize. Now? SAG-AFTRA built a contract for them. The money is real. The productions are hiring. 

Does that mean you should drop everything and pivot to micro-dramas? No. Get your fundamentals right first. But if you’re already in the game and looking for more opportunities . . . this is a door that just opened.

And doors that just opened tend to have less competition on the other side.

[Mason has more advice on other matters of interest to actors—not just verticals—so interested actors should log onto his blog and have a look.]


22 March 2025

"Fonda Doing Good"

 

[The article paying tribute to actress Jane Fonda (b. 1937), the 2024 recipient of the SAG Life Achievement Award, appeared in SAG-AFTRA, the membership magazine of SAG-AFTRA, the media performers' union, in the Digital Special Issue 2025 (Volume 14, Number 1).

[SAG-AFTRA, the union that represents film and television actors, journalists, radio personalities, recording artists, singers, voice actors, and other media professionals worldwide, is the successor in 2012 to the Screen Actors Guild (SAG, created in 1933) when it merged with the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (created in 1937 as the American Federation of Radio Artists [AFRA], becoming AFTRA in 1952 after merging with the Television Authority). 

[The SAG Life Achievement Award retains the name under which it was established in 1962.  It’s awarded for “outstanding achievement in fostering the finest ideals of the acting profession.”  Last year’s honoree was Barbra Streisand; see Barbra Streisand, 2023 Life Achievement Honoree of the Screen Actors Guild (17 September 2024) on Rick On Theater.]

The 60th SAG Life Achievement honoree embodies profound commitment to advocacy and self-actualization.

Throughout her nearly seven-decade career that began at the Omaha Community Theater in 1954 [making her début with her father in the OCT production of Clifford Odets’s (1906-63) The Country Girl], Jane Fonda has worn many labels. Growing up, her much-celebrated father, actor Henry Fonda [1905-82], convinced her she was “fat.” In 1958, legendary acting coach Lee Strasberg [1901-82] concluded she was “talented.” Early critical reviews of her work called her everything from “fragile” to “coltish” and even “translucent.” And in a recording made Sept. 17, 1971, President Richard Nixon [1913-94; 37th President of the United States: 1969-1974] opined that, “She’s a great actress. She looks pretty. But boy, she’s often on the wrong track.”

To be a high-profile woman is to be the target of those with an agenda. For many, Fonda was — and still is — something to be weaponized, celebrated, demonized, idolized, mythologized and chastised.

Few have been defined and redefined by the cultural narrative as thoroughly and frequently.

Of course Fonda, with her fearless commitment to authenticity, both in her craft and in her persona, has refused to take a passive role in any part of her public evolution. In fact, she’s been among the rare politically active Hollywood figures who’s managed to remain so consistently on the right side of history. A rewatch of Fonda’s many speeches from her early days of activism reveals well articulated points that are as relevant today as they were more than half a century ago. In countless Nixon-era interviews, Fonda’s demeanor is direct, her confidence unwavering, as she exposes the lies of multiple administrations, speaks about the unsustainability of capitalism and encourages her interviewers to question their own beliefs. “Everyone seems to think that the word revolution means violence,” she observes. “Any healthy country, like any healthy individual, should be in perpetual revolution.”

Revolutionary Performance

Onscreen, many point to Fonda’s Academy Award winning role as Bree Daniels in Klute (1971) as her first major artistic revelation. Still grappling with the nuances of feminism, Fonda initially hesitated to agree to a role that would have her play a sex worker. Once she understood that true gender equity is about “going deep” and depicting a human being — any human being — with honesty and authenticity, she and director Alan J. Pakula [1928-98] meditated on all the psychological ramifications of sexual abuse on an individual.

Prior to production, Fonda was undergoing a transformation — she’d gone to India, became an advocate and had experienced getting arrested (nearly half a dozen times). Thanks to her newfound personal and political growth, Fonda insisted that Pakula cast a woman, not a man, to be Daniels’ psychiatrist. And in her most emotional scene — where she recalls her visit to the morgue to view photos of female victims — Fonda found herself “crying for women . . . for the pain of women who are abused.” She was “changing,” “and that’s what made this scene right.”

Fonda’s much-acclaimed performance in Klute compelled film historian Richard Shickel [sic; Schickel, 1933-2017] to note in his Life magazine review [“New Heights for a Fallen Fonda,” 30 July 1971], “It seems to me unquestionable that Jane Fonda here emerges as probably the finest screen actress of her generation.”

A Feb. 22, 1960, feature in Life [Tom Prideaux, “Flowering of a New Fonda”] celebrating Fonda’s silver screen debut in Tall Story declares, “Like an ancient goddess who was born full-grown out of her father’s head, Jane Fonda at 22 has sprung up almost magically as a full fledged and versatile actress.” [In Greek mythology, Athena, a goddess associated with wisdom, warfare, and handicraft, had no mother and was born from the forehead of her father, Zeus.]

While Fonda’s life may have some parallels to the myth of motherless Athena to which the author was alluding — Fonda’s own mother died by suicide when Fonda was just 12 — it could be argued that her journey as an artist and an individual is more akin to the symbolism of Inanna, the Sumerian deity whose mythology, like the true nature of womanhood, contains more contradictions than can be counted. In her life, Fonda has lived communally as a Marxist, and then sumptuously on 2 million acres as a billionaire’s [CNN founder Ted Turner (b. 1938; m. 1991-2001)] wife. She’s a feminist working to “heal the wounds the patriarchy had dealt,” but whose journey toward authenticity has been heavily influenced by each of the marriages to her wildly diverse husbands [French screenwriter, film director, and producer Roger Vadim ​(m. 1965-73)​; social and political activist, author, and politician Tom Hayden ​(m. 1973-90); Turner]. Depending on the audience, she may be known as a subject of the male gaze (Barbarella, 1968), a symbol of feminism (9 to 5, 1980) or a fitness guru (Jane Fonda’s Workout, 1982).

One could even make a case for Fonda’s prophetic abilities following her prescient role in The China Syndrome (1979), in which she portrays reporter Kimberly Wells discovering a cover-up at a nuclear power plant. Twelve days following the film’s premiere, the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania experienced a partial meltdown [28 March 1979] — the most devastating accident of its kind in U.S. history. And then, mirroring 2023’s TV/Theatrical/ Streaming strike strategy, the film that enabled her to heal some of the emotional wounds inflicted by her father, On Golden Pond (1981), was produced thanks to a SAG interim agreement during the 1980 strike — a labor action that achieved the first-ever residuals for pay-per-view, video cassette and disk sales. Fonda, of course, donated $5,000 to the strike fund. Following a decade of established success in the ’80s as a star, producer and workout authority, Fonda — like the ancient goddess descending into the underworld [the ancient Mesopotamian goddess of love, war, and fertility, Inanna, descended into and returned from the Mesopotamian underworld] — took a 15-year retreat from acting. It was a time in the heroine’s journey for reassessment. Fonda’s conclusion following her hiatus? She needed to stop putting another person’s needs first.

“There was this angel on my shoulder,” she said in a 2018 interview with People about her divorce from media mogul Ted Turner [Gillian Telling, “Jane Fonda Explains Why It Took Her Until Her 60s to ‘Become Who I Was Supposed to Be,’” 19 Sept. 2018]. “If you stay, you will die without ever becoming who you can be. You will not really be authentic.”

The Third Act

Fonda has said it took her 30 years to understand feminism. Her frequently quoted epigram, “We are not meant to be perfect; we are meant to be whole,” is the crystallization of decades of lessons from acting, relationships, activism and living. It’s the type of wisdom that leads to performances that resonate with multitudes. In Fonda’s self-labelled “third act,” she has portrayed Grace & Frankie’s [Netflix TV series, 2015-22] Grace Hanson, a character who validates the vulnerabilities and complexities of older women. And, 50 years after their first onscreen pairing in Barefoot in the Park (1967), Fonda and Robert Redford reunited for Our Souls at Night (2017), a drama that allowed Fonda to deliver an intimate, subtle and exquisitely realized performance — an achievement crafted from a lifetime of devotion to understanding humanity and herself.

And all that understanding can make a woman extremely funny. It’s no wonder comedy has also been a defining feature of this onscreen chapter. Book Club (2018), Book Club: The Next Chapter (2023), 80 for Brady (2023), and Fonda and Lily Tomlin’s women-in-comedy celebration Ladies’ Night Live (2022) are all projects that showcase the unique humor and sexuality that comes from a life well-lived.

With the rare ability to question her role in the world, reflect on her own motivations and examine her interior life, Fonda is the embodiment of what it means to be an artist truly dedicated to the spiritual nature of performance. It’s the secret sauce that makes her work so stunningly, captivating.

Climate and Beyond

Now 87, nearly all of Fonda’s focus is centered on the most crucial issue of our time: climate change. Her Jane Fonda Climate PAC is a political action committee with a mission to “do what it takes to defeat fossil fuel supporters and elect climate champions at all levels of government.” Supporters are encouraged to sign up for updates at janepac.com.

Fonda’s lifetime of accolades include[s] two Oscars, two BAFTA [British Academy of Film and Television Arts] Awards, an Emmy, seven Golden Globes, the 2015 AFI Life Achievement Award, the Cecil B. DeMille Award, Elle’s Women in Hollywood Icon award and the Women in Film Jane Fonda Humanitarian Award, named after Fonda for her lifelong activism and philanthropic commitments.

She accepted the Harry Belafonte Voices for Social Justice Award at the 2023 Tribeca Film Festival. Most recently, in April of 2024, Fonda accepted the Time Magazine Earth Award.

On Sunday, Feb. 23 [2025], Fonda will receive the 60th SAG Life Achievement Award at the 31st Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards [at the Shrine Auditorium in Los Angeles]. “Jane Fonda is a trailblazer and an extraordinary talent, a dynamic force who has shaped the landscape of entertainment, advocacy and culture with unwavering passion,” said SAG-AFTRA President Fran Drescher [b. 1957; President of SAG-AFTRA: 2021-Present]. “We honor Jane not only for her artistic brilliance, but for the profound legacy of activism and empowerment she has created. Her fearless honesty has been an inspiration to me and many others in our industry.”

“I am deeply honored and humbled to be this year’s recipient of the SAG Life Achievement Award.” Fonda told SAG-AFTRA. “I have been working in this industry for almost the entirety of my life and there’s no honor like the one bestowed on you by your peers. SAG-AFTRA works tirelessly to protect the working actor and to ensure that union members are being treated equitably in all areas, and I am proud to be a member as we continue to work to protect generations of performers to come.”

[The SAG Life Achievement Award Statuette is made using a process that involves creating two molds from wax models and then pouring in molten bronze heated to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.  Once the bronze is cooled and freed from the ceramic, each mask is polished and refined.  After the comedy and tragedy masks are carefully welded together, the finished statue is then oxidized with a process that involves a mixture of chemicals and heating with a blow torch to give the award its green patina.]

*  *  *  *
“ORIGINALS” 

[In the 31st Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards special edition of SAG-AFTRA magazine, the union paid tribute to some of the 61 previous recipients for Life Achievement (in 1985 and 2000, the award was given to two honorees).  The union selected 18 former award recipients and quoted some of their remarks from their acceptance speeches (or from those who accepted the awards for them). 

[Needless to say, these are all esteemed and even beloved film actors whose names are known far beyond Hollywood.  Wikipedia has a chart of all 62 past awardees, and SAG-AFTRA has a photo montage of them all on which one can click for bios of each individual winner.]

As Queen Latifah said in 2008 [at the Kennedy Center Honors on 7 December in the Kennedy Center Opera House] while paying tribute to Barbra Streisand — the woman who would become the 2023 Screen Actors Guild Life Achievement Award honoree — “An original doesn’t conform to our expectations, she changes them . . . forever.”

Such is the legacy we honor in each of our 60 Life Achievement recipients chosen by the union’s Honors and Tributes Committee. They are talented originals who have made a lasting impact in creating a kinder, more equitable world while enhancing the art of the craft.

James Stewart [1908-97]

“This award you have so generously given me is ‘for outstanding achievement in fostering the finest ideals of the acting profession.’ Well, alright, I can live with that,” said sixth recipient Stewart. “There have been a lot of tears, but then also there have been a lot of laughs, and that’s what show business is all about. Thank you. Thank you very much.” [Stewart was the 6th recipient of SAG Life Achievement Award in 1968.]

Eddie Cantor [1892-1964]

The first Life Achievement honor [1962] was presented to Screen Actors Guild’s second president [1933-35] and first president of American Federation of Radio Artists (AFRA) [1937-40]. Unable to attend the presentation during the annual membership meeting, his friend, the legendary Jack Benny [1894-1974], accepted on his behalf.

Bob Hope [1903-2003]                                    

“This is a beautiful award. It looks like [Bing] Crosby [1903-77] before and after the honeymoon,” joked third honoree Bob Hope [1965]. “I don’t know what can possibly top this unless Lawrence Welk [1903-92] lets me run his bubble machine . . . I am proud to be a member of the Screen Actors Guild. I thank you very, very much for this award, and it just proves that a miracle can happen if you pay your dues regularly.”

Pearl Bailey [1918-90]

When SAG President Kathleen Nolan [b. 1933; President of SAG: 1957-62] presented the award, she listed some of Bailey’s past accolades that contributed to her being selected for this honor: “The March of Dimes award for 1968 and the USO Woman of the Year award for 1969 . . . [and] on Nov. 24, 1975, she was appointed by President Gerald R. Ford [1913-2006; 38th President of the United States: 1974-77] as special advisor to the U.N. Mission to the United Nations, a role which she feels will fulfill her desires to help all humanity more.” [Bailey was the 14th honoree in 1976.]

Danny Kaye [1911-87]

Wife Sylvia Fine Kaye [1913-91; m. 1940] accepted on his behalf, as he was in the hospital: “He . . . particularly wanted to be here today . . . He’s very proud of the acting profession, which has a long and glowing tradition of democracy in action and wholehearted public service, and if you feel that he has added luster to your traditions, he’s proud indeed and I thank you for him.” [Kaye was the 19th awardee in 1982.]

Katharine Hepburn [1907-2003]

“Good afternoon, everybody — I should say ‘fellow workers.’ That makes me sound revolutionary,” said 17th recipient Hepburn [1979]. “I am dumbfounded, and at the same time, I am very proud to have been chosen by the Screen Actors Guild as a good example, professionally and personally. It’s always heartening to be told by one’s own fellows that one is first rate, and that they wish to say so publicly.”

Audrey Hepburn [1929-93]

“I am more than ever awed and overwhelmed by the monumental talents it was my great, great privilege to work for and with,” 29th honoree Hepburn [1992] wrote in an acceptance letter just two weeks before her death. “There is therefore no way I can thank you for this beautiful award without thanking all of them . . . [who] guided and nurtured a totally unknown, insecure, inexperienced, skinny broad into a marketable commodity.”

Burt Lancaster [1913-94]

Daughter Johanna [b. 1951; film and television producer; “Joanna,” according to the website MyHeritage], accepting on his behalf: “I think my father is an enemy of anything that would erode the human spirit . . . My father doesn’t think of himself as a philanthropist. The word is too sedate to inspire him. I’ve always seen him more as a compassionate anarchist, someone who likes to stir it up and who feels an obligation to give back to the people and organizations which make a difference in his life. Thank you.” [Lancaster was the 28th recipient in 1991.]

Brock Peters [1927-2005]

“I could bemoan all the barriers and difficulties I have experienced and witnessed and fought over the years, but I have been extremely fortunate in my life to find friends who have gathered around me in the times of greatest need or who are just there to be helpful or to seek help from me or to just be friends,” said 27th recipient Peters [1990]. “Today I know that my family is even greater — you are all part of my extended family.

Kirk Douglas [1916-2020]

“You know what? When they first spoke to me about this award, lifetime achievement, I was scared. I saw a committee going over my medical file: ‘We have to give him something,’” joked 35th honoree Douglas [1998]. “Well, maybe then they learned that I have just finished a movie, they might want to take the award back! But what the hell, I am young, I have made 82 movies.”

Clint Eastwood [b. 1930]

“I got in the Screen Actors Guild back in the early ’50s, and Walter Pidgeon [1897-1984; President of SAG: 1952-57] was the president then,” recalled 39th recipient Eastwood [2002]. “I remember calling my parents and saying that I’m in the same union with Walter Pidgeon, [James] Cagney [1899-1986] and [Gary] Cooper [1901-61] and Barbara Stanwyck [1907-90] and Bette Davis [1908-89] . . . I thought I was hot stuff, until I started knocking on doors and getting the turndowns. So I appreciate everything that all of you have had to go through at some time in your life.”

Elizabeth Taylor [1932-2011]

“This award is especially important to me because it’s given by my peers,” 34th recipient Taylor [1997] penned in an acceptance letter. “Not only for my first career, acting — but, for what has now become my life: the eradication of the AIDS epidemic . . . Thank you for honoring me tonight.” [Throughout the 1990s, Taylor focused her time on HIV/AIDS activism. In 2001, President William Clinton (b. 1946; 42nd President of the United States: 1993-2001) awarded Taylor the Presidential Citizens Medal, the nation’s second-highest civilian honor, for her AIDS philanthropy.]

Dick Van Dyke [b. 1925]

“I am looking at the greatest generation of actors in the history of acting,” 49th honoree Van Dyke [2012] told the audience. “You’ve all lifted the art, I don’t know, to another place now. And besides that, you’re everywhere. You’re in Darfur, Somalia, Haiti, New Orleans, you’re all over the place, trying to do what’s right . . . And all I have to say is if this very heavy object means that I can refer to you as my peers, I’m a happy man.”

Mary Tyler Moore [1936-2017]

“In 1955 . . . I sought out the Screen Actors Guild in hopes of becoming a member. [Moore appeared in live TV commercials for Hotpoint home appliances that ran during The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet (1952-66).] But . . . there were six other Mary Moores on the SAG pages. Word came back: ‘Want to work in ‘the business’? Change your name, sweetheart.’ . . .  [Since at least 1933, SAG rules have prevented members from using the same professional name as another member, or a name that could be easily confused with another member’s name, to avoid confusion and ensure clarity.] Tyler was my middle name,” said the 48th recipient [2011]. “I spoke it out loud. ‘Mary Tyler Moore.’ It sounded right . . . SAG was happy. My father was happy. And tonight, after having the privilege of working in this business among the most creative and talented people imaginable, I too, am happy, after all. Thank you.”

James Garner [1928-2014]

“You look at the list of wonderful actors who have been recipients of this award — and I’m not at all sure how I got here. I’m just so humbled to be a part of such a distinguished group,” said 41st honoree Garner [2004]. “And, well, we actors, we seldom know how we are perceived by others, but this wonderful award lets me know, ‘Hey, Jim, you must have done something good.’ So to have actors think of me in these terms, it touches me deep, deep, deep, deep in my heart.”

Debbie Reynolds [1932-2016]

“God gave us talent, so we’re very fortunate, we all are . . . [.] My favorite movie was The Unsinkable Molly Brown [MGM, 1964; adapted from the 1960 Broadway musical of the same title by Richard Morris and Meredith Willson]. And I had a lot of fun doing that. In that movie I got to sing . . . a song called I Ain’t Down Yet. Well, I ain’t. Thank you all very much for this wonderful award.” [Reynolds was the 51st honoree in 2014.]

Morgan Freeman [b. 1937]

“These moments in one’s life usually will call for an entire litany of thank yous. I can’t do that because I don’t know all of your names. So I won’t try,” joked 54th recipient Freeman [2017]. “I do want to thank SAG-AFTRA for this enormous honor. This is beyond honor. This is a place in history.”

Sally Field [b. 1946]

“I’ve worked my whole life. I’ve ridden the highs and tried to learn from the lows. And in all of these almost 60 years, there is not a day that I don’t feel quietly thrilled to call myself an actor,” 58th honoree Field [2022] told the audience. “Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for this great honor from you, the people I most wanted respect from in my life: actors. Thank you.”