Showing posts with label Samuel Beckett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Samuel Beckett. Show all posts

21 October 2025

'Waiting For Godot' on Broadway, 2025 (2)

 

[A new production of Samuel Beckett’s (1906-89) Absurdist masterpiece, Waiting for Godot (1953), opened on Broadway on 28 September, after starting previews at the Hudson Theatre on 13 September.  Its limited run, directed by Jamie Lloyd, is scheduled to end on 4 January 2026. 

[The production stars Keanu Reeves as Estragon in his Broadway début, and Alex Winter as Vladimir.  The rest of the cast is made up of Brandon J. Dirden as Pozzo and Michael Patrick Thornton as Lucky, with Zaynn Arora (also making his Broadway début) and Eric Williams alternating as the Boy.

[The scenic and costume design are by Soutra Gilmour, the lighting design is by Jon Clark, and the sound design is by Ben and Max Ringham.

[After my posting of the transcript of a PBS News Hour segment, run last Saturday, 18 October, I’m now posting another transcript of an interview with Reeves and Winter, this one of Steven Colbert’s Late Show from last week.

[A few words about the transcription below: There was only one posted transcript, from the three YouTube videos of the interview.  The dialogue, which was line-by-line—i.e., no paragraphing or other divisions—and in all caps.  The lines were broken by seconds, with the time stamp for each second on a separate line of the transcript.  It was also terribly inaccurate, with lots of mistranscriptions, missing words, misattributions of the speaker, and so on.  (Several renderings of “Alex Winter and Keanu Reeves” came out “ALEX WINTER ENCOUNTER REEVES”!)

[To fix all these and other issues with the transcript, I had to go back and listen to the DVR I’d made of the show in a stop-rewind-and-go method to reconcile them with the recording.  (It’s easier and more convenient to use my computer to type in the corrections while watching and listening to my TV than to try to shift back and forth between my word processor and the YouTube or CBS video on the Internet.)

[So, the result you will read below is a combination of the transcriber, almost certainly a machine with little human monitoring, and my own rendering of the conversation, plus my interpretation of the punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, and other typographical considerations.  I’ve also added some bracketed explanatory and identifying insertions I thought would be helpful.]

THE LATE SHOW WITH STEPHEN COLBERT:
KEANU REEVES & ALEX WINTER 

[This episode of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert (CBS Broadcasting Inc., Paramount Skydance) aired on 13 October 2025 (Season 11, Episode 19).  Reeves and Winter were Colbert’s only guests, aside from a musical performance at the end of the show by rapper J.I.D.]

Stephen Colbert: Hey! Hello, friends. Welcome back, everybody.

Ladies and gentlemen. My fellow Americans. My next guests tonight are currently co-starring in a new Broadway production of “Waiting for Godot.” You know them best as “Bill and Ted,” but please welcome back to “The Late Show,” Alex Winter and Keanu Reeves!

[CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]

There you go. Nice to have you guys here. Thanks for making the trip up from the Hudson Theatre up here to the Ed Sullivan to join on a rare night off. ‘Cause you guys are doing eight shows a week, right?

Keanu Reeves [off-camera]: We are, yeah.

Colbert: For “Waiting for Godot” on Broadway.

[CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]

Never done it, kinda jealous. Love the play. Let’s start with how some might be surprised that it’s pronounced GA-doh, instead of most people in America they think of guh-DOH. So, are you guys being fancy?

[Reeves and Winter LAUGH]

Colbert: Are we being fancy? Are you fancy [pointing to Winter] and are you schmancy [pointing to Reeves]?

Reeves: If that’s fancy and schmancy, what’s the other one?

Colbert: Guh-DOH?

Winter: Down-home? Heartland?

Colbert: Just down-home, American, heartland, existential dread.

Winter: There you go. Right.

Well, the play was written by an Irishman in French.

Colbert: Oh, there you go. There you go.

Winter: It was kind of almost mundane. There’s a lot of rhyming in the play, and GA-doh works better with the other names of the characters that are all Pozzo . . . Gogo [nickname of Estragon, Reeves’s character] . . . Godot. And he’s constantly confusing Godot for Pozzo. ‘I said Pozzo.’ ‘No, you said Godot.’ ‘No, you said Godot.’ It doesn’t work if ‘You said Pozzo.’ ‘No, you said Guh-DOH.’ What?

Colbert: You have been linked, obviously, in the public’s mind since the 1989 release . . . right there [showing photo] of “Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure.”

[CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]

First of all, I understand you guys met in the audition process? Tell me about meeting each other for the first time.

Reeves: My recollection was there was a room . . .

Winter: . . . little room.

Reeves: You were sitting down. I walked in. Said “Hey, what’s up?” You said, “Hey, what’s up.”

Winter: Yeah. Motorcycle helmet and motorcycle helmet [pointing].

Reeves: We talked about motorcycles and . . .

Both: . . . bass guitars.

Reeves: We had stuff in common.

Winter: Yeah. And then it expanded into, like, literature and theater. And then it was, “Oh, he’s east coast and I’m east coast. We’d come from theater. There was a lot of similarities to our backgrounds, and we were two fish out of water actors in L.A. So . . . .

[Winter (b. 1965) did some Broadway shows early in his career. He made his Broadway début as a replacement for Louis Leonowens, the son of Anna Leonowens, in a 1977 revival of the musical The King and I, when he was 13, and played John Darling, the middle Darling child in a 1979 revival of the musical version of Peter Pan, when he was 14.  He also appeared at the Manhattan Theatre Club in the American premiere of Simon Gray's (1936-2008) Close of Play in 1981.

[Reeves’s (b. 1964) U.S. stage début is his role in Godot. His previous stage experience has been in Canada, which he claims as his home country (he’s a Canadian citizen, though born in Beirut, Lebanon, and spending some years in Sydney, Australia, before moving to Toronto). Among other roles, he played Hamlet in Shakespeare’s classic masterpiece in a production at a Canadian regional theater in Winnipeg, Manitoba, in 1995. On 12 April 1989, Reeves appeared in his only other U.S. theater role, the part of Kip in a telefilm adaptation of Richard Greenberg’s (1958-2025) 1985 one-act play Life Under Water on the Public Broadcasting Service’s American Playhouse series.]

Reeves: Yeah.

Colbert: Wow.

[CROSSTALK]

Colbert: How long had you each been in L.A. at that point? It can be lonely if you . . . .

Reeves: I was there like five . . . four . . . three . . . four years before.

Winter: Two years . . . a couple years before I come out.

Reeves: And then we got to act together. And that’s where, like, that thing happened [snapping his fingers].

Winter: It’s sort of like being in a band. You know, there’s that rhythm section. The comedy is, being who we are, we were both playing the same instrument, which isn’t how a rhythm section is supposed to work.

Colbert: Four hands on one bass . . . .

Winter: We would literally leave set and go to one of each other’s apartments with our mini amps and jam, both playing bass . . .

[LAUGHTER]

Winter: . . . for hours and hours and hours.

Colbert: How did the neighbors feel about that?

Winter: I mean, they thought we were out of our minds. But, it is kind of nuts in retrospect.

Colbert: Talking about “Waiting for Godot” – Keanu, I understand you first had the idea of doing this?

Reeves: Yeah, about three and a half years ago, I was in London, working. I had jet lag. I was in a fugue state. And, the muses kind of sang down from above and said: “Waiting for Godot” with Alex. And I went, UH! and I Facetimed you . . .

Winter: You did, yeah.

Reeves: . . . and proposed.

Winter: You did, yeah. I opened up the Facetime and this is what you always do because you always Facetime. And I’m not a Facetimer. And I’m like, ‘Oh, God, I’ve got to put on a shirt.’

Colbert: It’s not chest time. It’s just Facetime.

Winter: It’s a camera in your face.

Colbert: Oh, I understand. Yeah.

Winter: So, I open it and there is Reeves, his face jammed into this webcam: “You, me, “Godot.” I don’t know what it says that I knew what he meant by that, but I thought it was a great idea. We’d both been looking for something to do together that wasn’t Bill and Ted. We both love theater. We wanted to go back and do theater. I love Beckett. I knew what it entailed though—it was going to be a monster.

Colbert: It is! It’s a lot to bite off. You could’ve started with “The Odd Couple” [popular Niel Simon comedy, 1965 (Broadway), 1968 (film), 1970-75 (television)] and worked your way up.

Both: Yeah!

Winter: Every time someone suggests an alternative, he’s like, yeah, we shoulda done that.

Reeves: Yeah!

Colbert: We have to take a quick break. We’ll be right back with more Keanu Reeves and Alex Winter, everybody.

[COMMERCIAL BREAK]

Colbert: Everybody, we are back with the stars of “Waiting for Godot” at the Hudson Theatre here in New York, Alex Winter and Keanu Reeves. It’s one of the most famous plays of the 20th century. It’s performed all the time. It’s often misinterpreted. People don’t know that while it’s a tragedy, is a tragicomedy, very funny.

[There are a number of Godot-related posts on Rick On Theater (and a few more on other Beckett plays), but one that applies to Colbert’s remark above is “History of Waiting For Godot” (30 March 2009). I will append a list of all the Godot posts at the bottom of this transcript.]

Reeves: It is, yeah.

Colbert: Take a stab, one of you, and explain to the audience, if you don’t mind, what it’s about.

Reeves: It can’t just be one thing.

Colbert: Okay. We’ve got all the time in the world.

Winter: Settle in.

Reeves: If “Hamlet” is “To be or not to be, that is the question,” Beckett in “Waiting for Godot” says, ‘That is not the question.’ ‘What are we doing here,’ that is the question.

[APPLAUSE]

Reeves: And it starts to, in a broad sense . . . it talks about our relationship to a personal god. And it’s like, ‘Can we be seen?’ ‘Will we be judged?’ Really, ‘Will he save us, punish us, will we be seen?’ In a broad sense.

And then there is friendship, codependence, yearning, waiting. What are we waiting for? What can we do? [nb: The French (i.e., “original”) title of the play is En attendant Godot, which means “While waiting for Godot.”] How do we relate to each other? There’s elements of power dynamics with the character [sic] Pozzo and Lucky.

Winter: Yeah, there’s brutality, characters can become both brutal and loving. You end up playing all of life in the course of two hours, which is . . . it’s kind of a trip to be honest with you, it is so beautifully written.

Reeves: Yeah, and about time, the collapsing of time, the human experience in the blink of an eye. I was born . . . in one day I can be born, one day I will die, one day I will be deaf, one day . . . . The circumstances of our life and how we relate to it.

Winter: We did talk about the fact that we’re both doing it in our . . . we were both going to turn 60 around the time we hit the stage and it is a play about reflection, about life and mortality and where are and what does it mean and what have you done and where are you going. [When the production started previews, Winter was 60 and Reeves had just turned 61.] And to be in that every night, and to say those words but to do that with a very close friend is pretty extraordinary.

Colbert: The design of it, it’s an unusual and very beautiful design. [Shows a photo of the Godot set, a long horn-like tube that creates a sense of forced perspective, sculpted of blonde wood and running from upstage to down, seemingly suspended in the air.]

Reeves: Aah! That’s our set.

Winter: Isn’t that cool?

Colbert: People see a lot of things in the set. You kept a list of the various things.

Winter: He is keeping – present tense – because it’s growing every day.

Colbert: I’m just curious, what . . . .

Reeves: We have the eye, the tunnel, the vortex, the sub-woofer, the habitrail, the lens.

[I’ve never found an explanation for the suggestion of the habitrail as a name for the central structure of the Godot set, so I looked it up to see what variant meanings it might have. The one that seems most fitting to me—and this is only my own view—is from the pinball machine. The wire ramps or tubes that guide the ball back to the player are sometimes called “habitrails.” The ball is sent on a meandering journey, buffeted by the flippers (and sometimes also the jostling of the machine), but always ends up in a tube that brings it back where it started. That sounds to me like the endless journey that Didi and Gogo are on. (If anyone has a better idea, please post it in the Comments section below.)]

Winter: The lens, the sewer, the habitrail.

Reeves: Circuits of time.

Winter: The circuits of time did come up at one point.

Reeves: We have the cross section of a tree. We recently got the shell.

Winter: The conch shell, which I think is a very beautiful one . . . .

Colbert: The sphincter.

Winter: That’s not incorrect. Yeah, yeah.  I like that.

Reeves: The gun barrel from the Bond opening. [That’s what it reminded me of right away – but it doesn’t really fit Godot.]

Colbert: That’s cool. To me, it does look like an eye. Because the iris is little lower, right here, looks like the eye’s looking down so it looks like the universe or God as a providence, that sort of thing. It looms, that’s for sure. It could also be a moon being eclipsed by something small.

Winter: Yeah.

Colbert: Yeah. Your life or something like that.

Winter: Yeah. It does happen. You’ll see there is an actual – not to spoil – but there’s an actual sun that drops . . . or moon that drops down into that back space.

Colbert: So I was right?

Winter: You are correct. You are literally correct.

Colbert: I was pretty sure. I’m usually right.

[LAUGHTER]

Colbert: Alex, you made your Broadway debut at how old?

Winter: 13. “The King and I” with Yul Brynner [1977].

Colbert [to Reeves]: Is this your Broadway debut?

Reeves: Yes, it is.     

[APPLAUSE]

Let’s talk for both of you, that sense of the butterflies before – not just opening night, but walking out on stage every night.

Reeves: Butterflies? Is that like terror butterflies?

Winter: I think it’s a polite way of saying you want to throw up.

Reeves: Right.

Colbert: Do you get that? Do you get that every night?

Reeves: Every night? Yes.

Colbert: What do you do? You have any particular rituals? People have – I slap myself in the face really hard twice before , , , . I do. Once, at the same time. I don’t want to do it right now, but I slap myself twice and I know I’ve done it hard enough if I regret having done it. Because, I’m awake and I’m leaving everything else backstage, and I just come on stage.

Winter: I have prayers that I always do . . .

Colbert: Oh, really . . . .

Winter: . . . before each act. I don’t take the risk of only just praying for the get through the play [sic], it’s a very hard play.

Colbert: Oh, one act at a time . . . .

Winter: So, each act of the play gets a prayer.

[To Reeves] You have a position that you take backstage that’s interesting. You’re sort of seeded for Estragon. Like I come out of my dressing room and I see you there in sort of a state, and I’m like, ‘Oh, he’s like seeding Estragon.’

Reeves: That’s true, yes.

Winter: That’s part of it.

Reeves: I sort of sit in the thing [takes a position in his seat, facing front with his arms folded in his lap].

Winter: That is what he’s doing. That is very Estragon.

Colbert: Totally.

We are going to take another break here but we’ll be right back with more Alex Winter and Keanu Reeves, everybody.

[COMMERCIAL BREAK]

Colbert: Hey, everybody. We are back with the stars of “Waiting for Godot” here in New York at the Hudson Theatre, Keanu Reeves and Alex Winter.

You both have new films. Alex, you have a movie directed, “Adulthood.” What’s “Adulthood”?

Winter: It’s a black comedy with Josh Gad and Kaya Scodelario, Billie Lourd, Anthony Carrigan [released 23 September]. It’s a wonderful cast. It’s an ensemble film about the impossibility of adulthood in our current society.

[APPLAUSE]

Colbert: [Inaudible] . . . social media keeps us . . . .

Winter: It’s hard . . . it’s hard out there for adults.

Colbert: Keanu, you have “Good Fortune” which opens on Friday [17 October].

[APPLAUSE]

Colbert: Is it true that after everything you’ve done, after all the “John Wicks” and all the “Matrices,” that this is the film that got you injured?

Reeves: Yes.

[LAUGHTER]

Colbert: If you don’t mind sharing . . . .

Reeves: I mean, comedy’s hard, right?

[Winter LAUGHS]

Colbert: Sure. Death is easy, comedy’s hard.

[The saying “Dying is easy, comedy is hard”—Colbert is paraphrasing the now-famous line—is attributed to British actor Edmund Gwenn (1877-1959) on his deathbed. The line has since been widely circulated and credited to other actors, but Gwenn is the most commonly cited source.]

Reeves: I fractured my patella.

Colbert: Your kneecap.

Reeves: My kneecap. I had a vertical break like a potato chip.

Colbert: I’m sorry, like a what?

Reeves: Like a potato chip.

Colbert: Did you hear it happen?

Reeves: I did not hear it pop because of the scream.

[Winter LAUGHS; Colbert GROANS]

Colbert: How? What were you doing? Pratfall or something?

Reeves: Okay – uhhh. I was doing a scene . . . we were doing a cold-water plunge with [writer, director, and cast member] Aziz Ansari and [cast member] Seth Rogen. And then, I was going back to the dressing room, they had a carpet – covering the carpet, there was a little thing and I caught my foot. I had a towel and I was cold and I was shuffling in my little ding-ding [sic]. And I caught my foot, and then I was like, whoa! And then I spiked and landed right on my knee.

[GROANS from audience, Winter, and Colbert]

Reeves: And then pain ensued.

Colbert: Potato chip.

Reeves: Yeah. Then it did that, then I couldn’t walk. But then I went to the hospital and they drained the blood.

Winter: And then you being you, you just kept shooting.

Reeves: I kept going.

But yeah, it made a lot of people laugh.

[LAUGHTER]

Colbert: That you potato-chipped your patella?

Reeves: They just said like, “You’re John Wick, and you just . . . .” I can’t swear, right?

Colbert: We can always bleep it.

Reeves: [BLEEP] broke your [BLEEP] [BLEEP].

Colbert: Sadly . . .

Reeves: The director’s like what? Aziz is like what? I can’t film because you broke your [BLEEP] kneecap. Sorry.

Colbert: We sadly lost, as I showed the interview before [in the Late Show’s segment before the Reeves-Winter interview], the great Diane Keaton [1946-2025; she died on 11 October at 79].

Keanu, people loved you two together in 2003, “Something’s Gotta Give.” Do you have a memory you can share of Diane Keaton in shooting this with her before we go?

Reeves: You know [to Colbert], and you know, too [to Winter]. We all know what an extraordinary, unique, special person and artist Diane is, was, and is. It was cool for me. I got to shoot the scene. Nancy Meyers directed. But it was Diane and Jack Nicholson at a table in a restaurant in Paris. And just watching those two legends, not only act, but insult each other.

[LAUGHTER]

You got a taste of it, I saw the clip that you shared. [An “attempted” interview on 30 April 2012 from The Colbert Report on Comedy Central.] She was almost like the same thing that she did to you, which was just like, she would turn to Jack, ‘You’re just a . . . you are a blah, blah, blah.’ And he’d be like, ‘You dirty, rotten . . . .’ They’re just grinning and they are insulting each other with love.

Winter: It sounds like our play.

Reeves: Yeah. The intelligence, the humor. But just watching them just be themselves and with the history and art that they worked.

Colbert: Alex, Keanu, thanks so much for being here. “Waiting for Godot” is currently at the Hudson

Theatre. Alex Winter and Keanu Reeves, everybody.

[The Godot post I cross-references above is a brief development and production history of the play.  Allow me to say a few words here that may reiterate what I wrote in 2009 on that post.  (Then I’ll list all the posts on ROT that pertain to Waiting for Godot.)

[First, let me pick up something Alex Winter mentions above: Samuel Beckett was an Irish writer who wrote often in French.  After studying modern languages at Trinity College Dublin, he took up a teaching position in Paris.  There, he was introduced to the Irish writer James Joyce, with whom he worked for years as a sort of assistant-cum-secretary.

[Beckett remained in Paris until 1930, when he went back to Dublin as a lecturer at Trinity College.  He stayed only until the end of 1931.  He traveled through Europe, writing essays, reviews, and novels, some of which were published and some were not.  As he did all this career, he wrote in both French and Englis—often in French first.

[After another short visit to Ireland in 1937, he returned to France to settle permanently in Paris in 1939, despite the start of World War II.  Though he made trips to England and Ireland, Beckett never lived there again.  When Germany invaded France and occupied the country in 1940, he joined the Résistance, and eventually had to flee Paris for a small town in the south, where he remained for the rest of the war.

[Beckett never stopped writing throughout the war and even his refuge and resistance efforts in the south.  He wrote Godot in French between October 1948 and January 1949.  (As I note above, the French version of the play is entitled En attendant Godot.)  After 1947, he wrote most of his works in French first.

[The point want to stress here is that Beckett didn’t just write Godot and his other works in French and then translate them into English.  He rewrote then in English.  The variation in the titles of En attendant Godot and Waiting for Godot isn’t the only difference between the to versions of the play.  Throughout the texts, there are differences—some small and subtle, some more prominent and significant. 

[The play’s titles can be a hint.  Waiting for Godot is a play about ‘waiting.’  But waiting is a static action.  When most people wait, they sit and read—the waiting rooms of offices everywhere are full of old magazines for people to read!  Maybe the waiters people-watch.  Still not active.  Today, with portable computers and internet-connected cell phones, maybe they work or play.  Not active.

[But En attendant Godot, as I noted above, means “while waiting for Godot.”  It’s about what Didi and Gogo do while they wait.  And remembering that the two characters are clowns—tramp clowns in the mold of Chaplin’s Little Tramp or Emmet Kelley’s Sad Willie—what wild activity would ensue . . . and does!  (Beckett loved music hall and clowns.  He was taken with the Marx Brothers and his 1965 movie Film starred Buster Keaton, the great silent-movie pantomimist.)

[And now, that list:

       •  History of Waiting For Godot” (30 March 2009)

         Thoughts on Waiting For Godot” (1 April 2009)

       •  More Thoughts on Waiting For Godot” (3 April 2009)

      •  Is Waiting For Godot Trash?” (17 April 2009)\

      •  "Beckett by the Madeleine" by Tom F. Driver (25 January 2018)

[And two that might be of less interest, performance reports on two productions:

  Waiting for Godot (Gare St. Lazare)” (31 October 2015)

  Waiting For Godot (Druid Theatre Company)” (21 November 2018)

[Don’t forget the post on 18 October, the News Hour transcript of the segment with Reeves and Winter of 10 October.]


18 October 2025

'Waiting For Godot' on Broadway, 2025 (I)

 

[A new production of Samuel Beckett’s (1906-89) Absurdist masterpiece, Waiting for Godot (1953), opened on Broadway on 28 September, after starting previews at the Hudson Theatre on 13 September.  Its limited run, directed by Jamie Lloyd, is scheduled to end on 4 January 2026. 

[The production stars Keanu Reeves as Estragon in his Broadway début, and Alex Winter as Vladimir.  The rest of the cast is made up of Brandon J. Dirden as Pozzo and Michael Patrick Thornton as Lucky, with Zaynn Arora (also making his Broadway début) and Eric Williams alternating as the Boy.

[The scenic and costume design are by Soutra Gilmour, the lighting design is by Jon Clark, and the sound design is by Ben and Max Ringham.]  

KEANU REEVES AND ALEX WINTER REUNITE ON STAGE
IN BROADWAY’S ‘WAITING FOR GODOT’
by Jeffrey Brown and Anne Azzi Davenport

[Below is the transcript of the PBS News Hour segment of 10 October 2025 in which Jeffrey Brown, the program’s arts correspondent, discusses the new production of Godot with its stars.]

It’s a classic of theater that continues to be taken on by top actors and still resonates with audiences. “Waiting for Godot” mixes despair and comedy to raise questions about the meaning of life. Now, Keanu Reeves and Alex Winter, two actors who are great friends, are doing their waiting on Broadway. Senior arts correspondent Jeffrey Brown has the story for our arts and culture series, CANVAS.

Geoff Bennett: It’s a theater classic that continues to be taken on by top actors and resonates with audiences.

“Waiting for Godot” — yes, that’s how it’s pronounced [GOD-oh] — mixes high despair and low comedy to raise big questions about, well, the meaning of life. And now two actors, great friends themselves, are doing their waiting on Broadway.

[GOD-oh is the standard pronunciation in Ireland and the United Kingdom.  In North America, it’s commonly pronounced go-DOH.]

Senior arts correspondent Jeffrey Brown gets a look for our arts and culture series, Canvas.

Keanu Reeves, Actor [in a scene from Godot]: Who am I to tell my private nightmares to if I can’t tell them to you?

Alex Winter, Actor: Let them remain private. You know I can’t bear that.

Keanu Reeves: There are times when I wonder if it wouldn’t be better for us to part.

Alex Winter: You wouldn’t go far.

Jeffrey Brown: Two men, Estragon, called Gogo, and Vladimir, or Didi, fearing, laughing, talking, waiting for someone they don’t know.

The two men playing them, Keanu Reeves and Alex Winter. And why are they here?

Keanu Reeves: Yes, but what did I know? I just had the — I just answered the universe and said you should do “Waiting for Godot” with Alex. And I was like, you’re right. OK, I will ask him.

(Laughter)

Jeffrey Brown: And he said?

Alex Winter: Absolutely. Yes, but it’s a mountain. Let’s go climb the mountain.

Jeffrey Brown: That mountain, “Waiting for Godot,” or Godot [GOD-oh], as they have chosen to pronounce it in this production, by Nobel Prize-winning Irish playwright Samuel Beckett.

Written and first performed in the 1950s, it’s still raising deep issues of human existence through a mix of pain and suffering along with broad comedy.

Actor [Brandon J. Dirden as Pozzo; in a scene from Godot]: Which of you smells so bad?

Keanu Reeves: He has stinking breath and I have stinking feet.

Actor: I must go.

Jeffrey Brown: Keanu Reeves, of course, is a mega-movie star, best known for his roles in “The Matrix” and “John Wick” series. This is his Broadway debut.

Alex Winter, a Broadway and film veteran, is best known in recent years as a director of documentaries, including one on rock star Frank Zappa.

Alex Winter AND Keanu Reeves: Excellent!

Jeffrey Brown: The two are forever linked through their roles starting in their 20s in the “Bill and Ted” sci-fi comedy films that began in 1989 about two rather clueless dudes who get their history lessons through time travel.

They have been close friends ever since, the kind who often finish each other’s sentences on and off stage. And when we met recently at Broadway’s famed Sardi’s Restaurant, Reeves, now 61, and Winter, 60, said taking on “Waiting for Godot” together was a must.

Is that because it made it more fun or because it got you past the fear of doing it or . . .

Keanu Reeves: For me, it just started with the fun.

(Laughter)

Keanu Reeves: This seems like a really good idea. Yes.

Alex Winter: Yes, and also that they’re — it is a play about two old friends who are interested in interrogating the questions of life, which is very much the two of us. So . . .

Jeffrey Brown: It is?

Alex Winter: Oh, yes.

Jeffrey Brown: You mean off stage.

Alex Winter: Oh, yes. Yes, yes, yes, like going back to — look, we’re goofballs and lead normal lives as well, but, like, I remember certain nights even on “Bill and Ted” one, it would be like 2:00 in the morning. We’d be sitting on the hood of my car in like in a strip mall in Phoenix, like, debating existence.

Keanu Reeves: Yes.

(Laughter)

Alex Winter: You know? So, like, in some ways, nothing has changed.

[In a scene from Godot] Look at me. Will you look at me?

Keanu Reeves: What a day.

Alex Winter: Who beat you? Tell me.

Keanu Reeves: Another day done with.

Alex Winter: Not yet.

Keanu Reeves: For me, it’s over and done with no matter what happens.

Jeffrey Brown: Are Gogo and Didi refugees from war or some environmental catastrophe, figures from outside of time? And who is this Godot?

Alex Winter: Beckett was cheeky, but he — I think he liked the fact that people debated these things. I think he was cheeky. He would say, oh, it’s not God necessarily, but maybe it is. You know what I mean? Like, I mean, come on.

(Laughter)

Alex Winter: Come on.

Keanu Reeves: Like, come on. If Samuel was here . . .

Alex Winter: Yes.

Keanu Reeves: I mean, come on.

Alex Winter: Yes.

Jeffrey Brown: You would say, come on, God — it is God.

Alex Winter: Of course God is in Godot, of course, of course, of course.

Steve Martin, Actor [in the 1988 Off-Broadway production at Lincoln Center]: Moron.

Robin Williams, Actor: Vermin.

Steve Martin: Abortion.

(Crosstalk)

Steve Martin: Sewer-rat. Curate. Cretin.

Robin Williams: Critic!

(Laughter)

Jeffrey Brown: The play has been done by certified funnymen such as Steve Martin and Robin Williams and amid boarded-up flooded homes [artist Paul Chan, Creative Time, and the Classical Theatre of Harlem staged a production in New Orleans in the flooded, hurricane-damaged Lower Ninth Ward and Gentilly neighborhoods, November 2007] in the wake of Hurricane Katrina [2005].

This production led by acclaimed British director Jamie Lloyd takes a stripped-down story and strips it further to a bare large tunnel, or cone, with no props at all. That, says Reeves, forced him to think and act in a new way.

Keanu Reeves: It’s even like the way I talked about the play early days, we can have mud, and why don’t we have water, and how about if we do this, and I will come out through the stage.

(Laughter)

Keanu Reeves: And then Jamie Lloyd and Soutra Gilmour, the production designer, went, here’s the set, and all of those ideas like a — like a mandala, just was like — that’s — get over that.

Jeffrey Brown: Yes. Did you find that freeing, though, too to not have the props?

Keanu Reeves: Oh, it’s freeing, but also illuminating. I think that our production is actually illuminating the themes of the play and what it’s asking and talking about. To have a literal tree that doesn’t look like a tree, you’re doing the same thing. You’re asking the audience to pretend that it’s got lots of leaves, and it’s like the spring.

Or then there’s a literal tree, and then I’m saying I see nothing. So they almost become more alive.

[Beckett’s original set instructions were: “A country road. A tree.”]

Alex Winter: Yes.

Keanu Reeves: And to the conceit, it’s more accurate.

Alex Winter: It is, yes. Every night, you find something else. We will come off stage even between act one and act two, and he will say or I will say, that — like, oh, wow, right, that.

Jeffrey Brown: But it’s still — you’re doing that between acts?

Alex Winter: Every night. Every night. Every night, there’s something. It’s just a play of limitless ideas and depth and possibility.

Keanu Reeves [in a scene from Godot]: Do you see anything coming?

Alex Winter: What?

Keanu Reeves: Do you see anything coming?

Alex Winter: No.

Keanu Reeves: Nor I.

Jeffrey Brown: Does it feel that way on stage too, where you’re saying, oh, I’m with Alex?

Keanu Reeves: Oh, yes. I get — I mean, so much of the night or the day of the performance, I’m just literally like looking at you . . .

(Laughter)

 

Alex Winter: Yes, we do a fair amount of that.

 

Keanu Reeves: . . . go through your contortions.

(Laughter)

Keanu Reeves: Poor Vladimir.

Alex Winter: Poor Vladimir.

Keanu Reeves: Trying to figure it out.

Alex Winter: I know, and failing miserably.

Jeffrey Brown: And how does the play land today, in a time of deep cultural and political divisions? Alex Winter had thought much about that, while Keanu Reeves offered lines from the play.

Alex Winter: And we’re certainly driving into it with the way we’re doing, is about looking past those divisions to this sort of human condition as a uniform issue that everyone faces, and this idea that we are all in this struggle together.

Keanu Reeves: And all mankind is us.

Alex Winter: Yes, for this moment of time.

Keanu Reeves: For this moment of time.

Alex Winter: Whether we like it or not. So let’s do something.

Keanu Reeves: Do something. Let us . . .

Alex Winter: I mean, that’s a pretty great thing to say right now.

Keanu Reeves: To help someone.

Alex Winter [lines from Godot]: Yes. Yes.

Keanu Reeves: We help him. We help him.

Alex Winter: Yes. Yes.

Keanu Reeves: Let us help him. We help him.

Alex Winter: Yes.

Keanu Reeves: Yes. Let’s go.

Alex Winter: Yes.

Jeffrey Brown: Is it ultimately a hopeless or hopeful play?

Keanu Reeves: Hopeful.

Alex Winter: Yes.

Jeffrey Brown: You’re going with hopeful?

Keanu Reeves: Yes.

Jeffrey Brown: Yes?

Keanu Reeves: I mean, they say, let’s go. Well, shall we go? Yes, let’s go.

Jeffrey Brown: But then they don’t move.

Alex Winter: But they’re together.

Keanu Reeves: But they still said, let’s go.

Alex Winter: Yes.

Keanu Reeves: They’re still doing it.

Alex Winter: Yes, they’re together. I think that — I think it lands. . .

Keanu Reeves: I will fight another day.

Alex Winter: Yes, they — it lands on this idea that it — that all we may have is each other, but that is enough to continue on. But everything else is up for grabs.

(Laughter)

Jeffrey Brown: Keanu Reeves and Alex Winter, Gogo and Didi, are waiting for Godot into early January.

Alex Winter: Finish a phrase, I tell you.

Keanu Reeves: Finish your own.

Alex Winter: Moron.

Keanu Reeves: That’s the idea. Let’s abuse each other.

Jeffrey Brown: For the “PBS News Hour,” I’m Jeffrey Brown on Broadway.

Alex Winter: Moron!

Keanu Reeves: Vermin!

Alex Winter: Abortion!

Bennett: Online, you can see more from Keanu Reeves and Alex Winter, including their mutual love of Dr. Seuss and their favorite plays. That’s on our YouTube page.

[A word or two about Godot and God: Many people in the English-speaking world feel that Godot is Beckett’s stand-in for God and that the name is meant to invoke that belief.  However, Becket refused to say so, though he hinted that he might have had that in his mind.  However, it should be remembered that he originally wrote the play in French (it had its world première in Paris in 1953), and in French, the word for God is ‘Dieu,’ which has no resemblance to the English word ‘God.’

[In his more than 30-year career with the PBS News Hour, Jeffrey Brown has served as co-anchor, studio moderator, and field reporter on a wide range of national and international issues, with work taking him around the country and to many parts of the globe.  As arts correspondent he has profiled many of the world’s leading writers, musicians, actors and other artists.  Among his signature works at the News Hour: a multi-year series, “Culture at Risk,” about threatened cultural heritage in the United States and abroad; the creation of the News Hour’s online “Art Beat”; and hosting the monthly book club, “Now Read This,” a collaboration with the New York Times.

[Anne Azzi Davenport is the Senior Producer of CANVAS at PBS News Hour.]


24 August 2023

Luck & Failure

 

BRYAN CRANSTON ON BEING READY FOR LUCK
by Bryan Cranston 

[The following transcript of a “Brief But Spectacular” essay aired on PBS NewsHour on 1 November 2018.  The essayist, actor Bryan Cranston (b. 1956), won the 2019 Tony for Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in a Play in Network, which opened at the Belasco Theatre on 6 December 2018 for a limited run and closed on 8 June 2019.]

Oscar-nominated actor Bryan Cranston, best known for his role as Walter White in “Breaking Bad,” didn’t get his big break until age 40, when he was cast in the family TV sitcom “Malcolm in the Middle.” Now, he’ll be playing the role of Howard Beale in the upcoming Broadway production of “Network.” He shares his brief but spectacular take on an unusual career trajectory and the role of luck.

Judy Woodruff: Oscar-nominated actor Bryan Cranston is best known for his Emmy-winning role as Walter White in the TV series “Breaking Bad” [AMC; 20 January 2008-29 September 2013].

But, as he explains in tonight’s Brief But Spectacular episode, it took him some luck to get there.

Starting next Saturday [Woodruff probably meant 10 November 2018, the first preview], Cranston will be playing the role of Howard Beale in the Broadway production of “Network,” based on the famous film [MGM; 1976].

Bryan Cranston: The first thing I look for when I read a script is, does the story move me?

What I truly love about this, and when I talk to audiences about anything I have done or any other movie or stage piece, is that the audience is always right. However you felt, however you reacted to something is always right. That’s how you felt.

And it’s remarkable how you can sit next to someone and watch a movie. I could be weeping, and they’re like, eh. It’s like, really? They say, yes, it missed me.

The only failure is if you move an audience to nothing, to boredom. If they are indifferent about what they just experienced, whether it’s a painting or a recital or a singer or a dancer or a play, if they are, I feel nothing throughout, then we failed. Then we failed.

Actors come to town, to New York or Los Angeles or London, and they say, you know, I’m going to give it a shot. I’m going to give it a year and see if I can become successful.

And to those, I want to say, I can save you a year of your time. If you think that this is something that you can carve out some arbitrary amount of time to achieve certain things, this is not for you. This is a lifetime.

When you first start out as an actor, your answer to any question is yes. Do you want to? Yes, I want to do that.

I started out in 1979 doing background work as an extra. Angry mob. Drunken frat boy. Reckless driver. And then, when you first get that break where you actually have a name, Steve, wow, I actually have a name, I’m Steve, you feel like you have progressed to some degree.

There’s no career that has ever been achieved in entertainment — I truly believe this — without a healthy dose of luck. Someone said, OK, kid, I will read your script, or, all right, you want to audition? Come in. Do it right now.

And then you got to be ready. Celebrity is a byproduct of what I do and what I like to do. It’s not what I was after. I was a working actor. Things were fine. I was paying my bills, leading a very middle-class economic life. And then I got a lucky break at age 40 and was cast in “Malcolm in the Middle” [Fox; 9 January 2000-14 May 2006].

At 50, I got an even bigger break when I was cast as Walter White on “Breaking Bad.”

That was my trajectory. It came when it was supposed to come. And that’s the interesting thing about luck. It doesn’t work on your timetable. It works on its own.

My name is Bryan Cranston, and this is my Brief But Spectacular take on being an actor.

[The backstory of “Brief But Spectacular,” a weekly series that premièred on NewsHour in 2015, begins with creator Steve Goldbloom, the creator and host of the original comedy news show for PBS, “Everything But the News,” and his longtime producing partner Zach Land-Miller who conduct every interview off-camera and off-screen.  (The segments are all two to four minutes long and there are no cutaways to reporters or interjections of questions.) 

[Each Thursday, “Brief But Spectacular” introduces NewsHour viewers to original profiles; these short segments feature some of the most original contemporary figures, offering passionate takes on topics they know well.  These have included household names like actors Alec Baldwin and Carl Reiner, artist Marina Abramović,  and activist Bryan Stevenson. 

[Topics have included comedian, writer, and director Jill Soloway (Amazon’s original series Transparent) on gatekeepers in Hollywood, journalist Ta-Nehisi Coates on police reform in America, Abramović on the art of performance, author Michael Lewis on finding disruptive characters, performers Abbi Jacobson and Ilana Glazer on the rise of their hit Comedy Central series Broad City, engineer Jason Dunn on creating the first 3-D printer in space, and many more.] 

*  *  *  *
A HUMBLE OPINION ON DERIVING MOTIVATION FROM FAILURE
by Elizabeth McCracken 

[Elizabeth McCracken’s essay about failure on “In My Humble Opinion,” from PBS News Hour on 11 March 2019, brought to mind Samuel Beckett’s advice: “Try again. Fail again. Fail better.”  I’ll present another essay on that passage from Beckett’s 1983 story “Worstward Ho” following this NewsHour transcript.]

It irks novelist and professor Elizabeth McCracken [b. 1966] when people say a success has “humbled” them. She argues it’s in fact failure that produces a humbling effect – but also a highly motivating one. McCracken offers her humble opinion on why the best work doesn’t derive from calm equilibrium, but rather from a “well-nourished, very private sense of revenge.”

Judy Woodruff: New Coke, the Fire Phone, big mistakes for Coca-Cola and Amazon, but their CEOs and those of many other companies have worked the concept of failure into their corporate culture.

Letting employees fail is seen as one way of finding the next big thing that works.

Novelist and professor Elizabeth McCracken also sees the value, but in her Humble Opinion, it’s the darker side of failure that ends up pushing you to success.

Elizabeth McCracken: Lately, I have been thinking about failure.

For instance, it’s a pet peeve of mine when people say that an honor has humbled them. It hasn’t. By what definition could that happen? You might mean that you think you should remain humble in the face of an honor. And, sure, why not? But it doesn’t actually humble you.

Failure, on the other hand, tends to humble people, which is right and also good, because only when you fail can you stand up and assess the damage and then, then get really furious, and vow revenge.

I teach creative writing, and I always tell my students that revenge is great motivation. People who are afraid of failure tend to say, I’m harder on myself than anyone else is.

This is never true.

Or else, my problem is that I’m a perfectionist, to which I always say, oh, you don’t like failing in public, unlike the rest of us?

In order to succeed, you have to risk failing. We all know that, but sometimes we forget that failure is actually good for you. Your immune system needs a bit of failure in order to be inoculated against further failure. The antibodies that failure produces are not pretty, but they are motivating, vengeance, hubris.

My most successful students have already failed. Maybe they didn’t get into graduate school the first time. Maybe they were rejected by a bunch of agents. Maybe they started a completely different career because their parents didn’t want them to be writers.

And failure instilled in them a particular feeling, not a commitment to their art or sense of peace about their fate.

“I thought,” one student of mine said just before she sold her novel, “I will show them.”

We often think that the best work comes from a place of equilibrium and support, but the thing is, equilibrium is pretty static, whereas a well-nourished, very private sense of revenge has enough heat and light to power a city, never mind a novel.

It’s almost heartwarming. Sometimes, when you think, I will show them, the them you end up showing is yourself.

Judy Woodruff: Elizabeth McCracken.

[“in My Humble Opinion,” the successor to “Essay” on NewsHour, was a series dedicated to video essays by writers, artists, and thinkers on diverse topics of interest to them.  I didn’t find confirmation, but it appears no longer to be a feature of NewsHour; perhaps it’s been subsumed into the segment called “Brief But Spectacular,” to which the first transcript in this post belonged.

[Elizabeth McCracken is an author and is a recipient of the 2002 L.L. Winship/PEN New England Award for Niagara Falls All Over Again.  McCracken, a graduate of the Iowa Writers’ Workshop, was born in Boston, Massachusetts, earned a Bachelor of Arts and a Master of Arts degree in English from Boston University, a Master of Fine Arts from the University of Iowa, and a Master of Science in Library Science from Drexel University.

[In 2008 and 2009, she lived in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where she was a fellow at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study. Formerly on the faculty of the Iowa Writers’ Workshop, McCracken holds the James Michener Chair of Fiction of the Michener Center for Writers at the University of Texas at Austin. She was a 1996 National Book Awards finalist for The Giant’s House, was on the 2014 National Book Awards long list for Thunderstruck & Other Stories, won the 2015 Story Prize for Thunderstruck & Other Stories, and made the 2015 Sunday Times EFG Private Bank Short Story Award shortlist for “Hungry.”]

*  *  *  *
’TRY AGAIN. FAIL AGAIN. FAIL BETTER’: HOW SAMUEL BECKETT 
CREATED THE UNLIKELY MANTRA THAT INSPIRES ENTREPRENEURS TODAY
by Colin Marshall 

[Because McCracken’s essay “A humble opinion on deriving motivation from failure” reminded me immediately of the quotation from playwright and poet Samuel Beckett (1906-89), "Try again.  Fail again.  Fail better,” I decided to add a short piece from Open Culture, a website that “scours the web for the best educational media.  We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.”  Published on 17 December 2017, the following essay discusses the full meaning of Beckett’s line.]

To what writer, besides Ayn Rand, do the business-minded techies and tech-minded businessmen of 21st-century Silicon Valley look for their inspiration? The name of Samuel Beckett may not, at first, strike you as an obvious answer — unless, of course, you know the origin of the phrase “Fail better.” It appears five times in Beckett’s 1983 story “Worstward Ho,” the first of which goes like this: “Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.” The sentiment seems to resonate naturally with the mentality demanded by the world of tech startups, where nearly every venture ends in failure, but failure which may well contain the seeds of future success.

Or rather, the apparent sentiment resonates. “By itself, you can probably understand why this phrase has become a mantra of sorts, especially in the glamorized world of overworked start-up founders hoping against pretty high odds to make it,” writes Books on the Wall‘s Andrea Schlottman.

“We think so, too. That is, until you read the rest of it.” The paragraph immediately following those much-quoted lines runs as follows:

First the body. No. First the place. No. First both. Now either. Now the other. Sick of the either try the other. Sick of it back sick of the either. So on. Somehow on. Till sick of both. Throw up and go. Where neither. Till sick of there. Throw up and back. The body again. Where none. The place again. Where none. Try again. Fail again. Better again. Or better worse. Fail worse again. Still worse again. Till sick for good. Throw up for good. Go for good. Where neither for good. Good and all.

“Throw up for good” — a rich image, certainly, but perhaps not as likely to get you out there disrupting complacent industries as “Fail better,” which The New Inquiry’s Ned Beauman describes as “experimental literature’s equivalent of that famous Che Guevara photo, flayed completely of meaning and turned into a successful brand with no particular owner. ‘Worstward Ho’ may be a difficult work that resists any stable interpretation, but we can at least be pretty sure that Beckett’s message was a bit darker than ‘Just do your best and everything is sure to work out ok in the end.’

But if Beckett’s words don’t provide quite the cause for optimism we thought they did, the story of his life actually might. “Beckett had already experienced plenty of artistic failure by the time he developed it into a poetics,” writes Chris Power in The Guardian. “No one was willing to publish his first novel, Dream of Fair to Middling Women, and the book of short stories he salvaged from it, More Pricks Than Kicks (1934), sold disastrously.” And yet today, even those who’ve never read a page of his work — indeed, those who’ve never even read the “Fail better” quote in full — acknowledge him as one of the 20th century’s greatest literary masters. Still, we have good cause to believe that Beckett himself probably regarded his own work as, to one degree or another, a failure. Those of us who revere it would do well to remember that, and maybe even to draw some inspiration from it.

[Based in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and broadcasts on cities and culture.  His projects include the book The Stateless City: a Walk through 21st-Century Los Angeles (in press) and the video series The City in Cinema.

[I’ve blogged several times on Samuel Beckett, all on his theater.  (Many of the posts have been about Waiting for Godot, which readers of Rick On Theater will probably know I think is a masterpiece.)  ROT’s Beckett posts are: “History of Waiting For Godot,” 30 March 2009; “Thoughts on Waiting For Godot,” 1 April 2009; “More Thoughts on Waiting For Godot,” 3 April 2009; “Is Waiting For Godot Trash?” 17 April 2009; “Waiting for Godot (Gare St. Lazare),”31 October 2015; “Beckett Trilogy: Not I, Footfalls, Rockaby.” 1 May 2016; "‘Beckett by the Madeleine’" by Tom F. Driver, 25 January 2018; and “Waiting For Godot (Druid Theatre Company),” 21 November 2018.]