SUPERSTITIONS
When my friend Kirk Woodward sent me his copy for the Rick On
Theater post that
became “Playwriting Bake-Off” (posted on 19 July), he included the wording of
the Summit Playhouse’s rules for a playwriting contest. It included the sentence: “During this time
of COVID 19, the ghost light is on in the theatre.”
Thus I learned the answer to a question that had been
niggling at me for years and years. I’d
been wondering what that stand-up light placed on a dark stage is called . . .
and now I know! It’s a ghost light!! (Thanks, Summit Playhouse!)
Looking up “ghost light,” I hit on the idea of a post on
theater superstitions and traditions. (You’ll
see the connection shortly.) My
unscientific opinion is that, after sports (especially baseball) and maybe seafaring
professions, theater has more superstitions and traditional beliefs than any
other field.
So here’s a round-up of many of the pervasive beliefs and
practices of theater folks that seem to defy logic and reason—even though, as
you’ll see, many originated in practical, though now perhaps obsolete,
situations. Some are observed nearly
universally by both pros and amateurs of the theater, even by non-believers . .
. because they’ve become accepted, even beloved theater traditions. Others are rarer or regional; quite a few
were new to me.
As far as the initial explanations or justifications for
these practices is concerned, I’m sure everyone is aware that superstitions and
traditions often have multiple origin stories; some are contradictory and many,
if not all, are apocryphal. Nonetheless,
I’m going to try to present as many of them as I can gather for the sake of
completeness. There’s no accounting for
what people will believe—which explains why there are so many religions in the
world.
Let me start with the practice that launched this
rumination: the “ghost light.”
Also known as the “Equity light” or “Equity lamp” (in
theater parlance, a ‘light’ is a lighting instrument such as a Fresnel or a
“baby spot”; a ‘lamp’ is a bulb or light source—the ‘lamp’ goes inside the
‘light’), or sometimes the “spirit light,” the ghost light is a moveable stand
with a single, bare bulb at the top enclosed in a wire cage. Illuminated, it stands down center on a
proscenium stage (or anywhere functional on other stage configurations) when
the theater is “dark,” that is not in use, such as days off for rehearsals,
days when the production isn’t performing (that is, “dark” nights), or for
extended periods when there’s no production booked at that house.
For practical reasons, the ghost light is left burning in
the empty theater to prevent anyone who comes in from wandering around the
stage in the dark and crashing onto scenery or equipment or falling into the
orchestra pit. (The names Equity light
and Equity lamp come from the fact that the Actors’ Equity Association, the
theatrical performers’ and stage managers’ union, demands it in its contracts.)
The origin of the presence of the ghost light, though, is
somewhat more fanciful.
First, a practical origin story: In the 19th century, before
theaters were electrified, they were lit by gas. Gas is highly combustible and pressure can
build up in the pipes if it’s not drawn off by use. A burning ghost light in a dark theater used
excess gas and eliminated the pressure that might build to an explosion. When theaters installed electric lights both
on the stage and in the auditorium (around 1881), the tradition of the ghost
light was retained.
As fanciful as this “history” might sound, the rest of the
story is more supernatural. One version
has the function of the light as a method to chase away mischievous spirits
that may hang around the theater and come out when it’s empty. As we’ll see, nearly every theater has a
legend of a ghost inhabiting it. A few
nights ago, I watched a TV mystery series episode set in a theater and someone
used the theater’s ghost myth as cover for murder. (The show was Australian and set in 1920s
Melbourne.)
The other version of the ghost light legend says that it
lights the way for the spirits of the theater to appease them and keep them contented. Some theater people add that keeping the
stage lit with the ghost light allows theater spirits to perform, keeping them
happy so they won’t curse the theater or sabotage the set or production.
There are other superstitions that concern the theater
building and how to care for it. For
instance, it’s ill-advised for actors to put shoes—and some people also say
hats—on tables or chairs back stage, such as in the dressing rooms or the Green
Room. According to the belief, it risks
a bad performance—but I suspect that it has more to do with disrespecting your
fellow actors by taking up chairs and table tops in the cramped back stage with
your personal property—especially shoes.
The Green Room, incidentally, is a room, or sometimes just a
space, back stage where the actors can wait or relax when they’re not on stage. It’s often wired for sound so the actors can
hear what’s going on on stage. Dressing
rooms are cramped and often not convenient to the stage. The Green Room can be used for many purposes,
such as a place for the director to give a pep talk before the curtain goes
up. The origin of its name has many
variations, some of them connected to the color the room is painted.
This account is contradicted, though, by another
superstition about the theater building: Never paint the Green Room green. This may be related to the prohibition of wearing
green on stage: the color is considered
bad luck. I’m not certain that the color
of a costume on stage and the color of a room back stage are related, but
maybe; superstitions are weird things. Anyway, I always heard that the Green Room was
named for the man who first used one, and his name was Green—but I never found
any confirmation of this explanation.
Another practice concerning the theater building itself, related
to the ghost light, is the closing of the theater one night a week. In the
United States and Britain (as well as many other Western nations), this is
traditionally on Monday nights, which conveniently gives the actors and crew a
day off after weekend performances (which, also traditionally, include a
Saturday matinee and evening performance and a Sunday mat, adding up to three
shows over two days).
The simple explanation for this practice is that Actors’
Equity requires a day off during each performance week and puts it in all union
contracts. (I believe all the theatrical
unions follow suit on this—the directors’, stage hands’, and theater staff guilds,
for instance.) Monday is the traditional
dark night in U.S. theaters, but some houses and productions close on other
weeknights instead.
The explanation for the one-dark-night tradition from the
superstitious, however, is that the theater ghosts like to relive their
performing days and the dark night gives them a chance to perform their own
plays as they did in life. I wonder if
the spirits that haunt other theaters pop in to see their peers work, just as
live actors try to do? Do you suppose there’s
a spectral director to stage the ghostly shows?
Among the superstitions of theater folk, the most common and
best known are curses and bad-luck bringers.
Arguably, the most famous of these is the curse of “The Scottish
Play.” Most of you probably already know
what this is.
The most wide-spread version of this superstition applies
only inside a theater and to speaking aloud, not thinking or writing (though
beliefs vary). Guided by that, I think
I’m safe to be specific here (cross fingers and knock on wood!).
This belief is quite simple: When in a theater, never speak
the name Macbeth. That Shakespearean
play must always be called “The Scottish Play” whenever someone refers to it. (Some actors say Macbee for the play and “Mr. M” and “Mrs. M” or “the Scottish
king”/”the Scottish lord” and “the Scottish lady” for the characters Macbeth
and Lady Macbeth.) Many actors even
avoid saying lines from Macbeth, especially
the Witches’ spells, inside a theater.
Company members working on a production of “The Scottish
Play” are, obviously, exempt from the prohibition. As Oskar Eustis reminded the 2006 cast of the
Macbeth (Central Park’s Delacorte Theater,
directed by Moisés Kaufman and starring Liev Schreiber as Big Mac) presented by
the Public Theater, of which Eustis is artistic director, their lines require
it. Otherwise, to breach this practice
will bring disastrous luck down on the current production in the theater and
all who work on it.
The supposed origin for this superstition is that Macbeth is a cursed play, stemming from
a catalogue of misfortunes that have befallen past performances of it,
including the first staging (1606) when the actor playing the title role died
shortly before or after the production.
Richard
Burbage is believed to have played Macbeth; he died of natural causes in 1619,
as much as 13 years after the play’s début performance (some records show that Macbeth’s public première at the Globe
was in 1610), at the age of 52—pretty old for the Elizabethan/Jacobean era (when
life expectancy was under 40 and only 59 if a man made it to 30).
In an alternative version of this rationale, it was an actor
named Hal Berridge who’d been cast as Lady Macbeth. He died of a fever, requiring Shakespeare to
replace him. (In Elizabethan and early
Jacobean times, women weren’t allowed to appear on stage and men or boys played
female roles until the Restoration in 1660.)
One contemporaneous account asserts that at the first performance of the
play in 1606, for King James I, William Shakespeare himself played the part at
short notice. (One assumes he already
knew the lines.)
There are several other familiar explanations for this
superstition. One is the belief that the
Weird Sisters’ lines are actual spells that will summon evil spirits. (The Elizabethans believed in witches and
actively hunted them.)
Another version
of this rationale has it that the use of the spells angered real witches and
caused them to curse the play. A third
version states that the Weird Sisters were played in the first production by
actual witches and thus brought a curse down on the play.
One rationale for the jinx on Macbeth is that Shakespeare himself put a curse on it so that no one
else but he could successfully stage it.
(How did that work out for ya, Will?)
Another, less mystical explanation
is that there is more swordplay in Macbeth
than most other Shakespearean plays, and therefore more chances for someone to
get hurt.
In point of fact, Macbeth
is no more unlucky than any other play or production. British actor Sir Donald
Sinden observed, “More actors have died during performances of Hamlet than in
the ‘Scottish play’ as the profession still calls it.” More accidents and injuries were probably
reported during the rehearsals and performances of the late Broadway
spectacular, Spider-Man: Turn Off The
Dark (2011-14)
In my brief performing life, I actually did Macbeth twice (the only play of which I
was in two productions). One was a New
Jersey community theater offering in which I played a character who was a
composite of Big Mac’s sons Malcolm and Donalbain (1979) and an excellent (if I
do say so myself) Off-Broadway staging in New York City in which I played the
Thane of Ross (1981). Both were
successful and during neither of which did anything awful happen. (Well, my stage name was misspelled on a
promotional post card in the New Jersey production, but that’s all.)
If an actor slips up and utters the name of the play in a
theater, there are traditional cleansing rituals required of the person who made
the mistake. The rituals are supposed to
ward off the evil that speaking the play’s title is feared to generate. The actor has to leave the theater (some
believers only make her or him leave the room and close the door), perform the
rite, and only then be invited back in.
The tradition usually requires the actor to turn around three
times (as always, there are variations), spit over her or his left shoulder,
swear or say a Shakespearean insult, or recite a line from another of
Shakespeare’s plays.
Popular lines for this ritual include: “Angels
and ministers of grace defend us” from Hamlet, “If we shadows have offended,
think but this and all is mended, that you have but slumbered here, whilst
these visions did appear” from A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and “Fair
thoughts and happy hours attend on you” from The Merchant of Venice.
Some casts add brushing yourself off, running around the
theater counterclockwise, tapping your left shoulder while saying the play’s
name. A variant cleansing ritual requires
the actor’s spinning around and brushing her- or himself off, and saying “Macbeth”
three times before reentering.
There are numerous parodies and travesties of the “Scottish
Curse.” Playwright Lee Blessing wrote The Scottish Play, which examines the
history of the tradition, and in the 2007 indie film Never Say Macbeth by screenwriter Joe Tyler Gold and director Christopher
J. Prouty, the play becomes a farce when a non-actor is accidentally cast in a
production as a witch and utters the name of the play, and sets off a cascade
of unfortunate events.
The superstition is even parodied in a November 2003 episode
of the animated TV series The Simpsons
called “The Regina Monologues.” While
visiting London, the Simpson family meets Sir Ian McKellen outside a theater
showing Macbeth. (McKellen actually did the play opposite Judi
Dench as Lady Macbeth for the Royal Shakespeare Company, opening in 1976 at the
RSC’s home theater in Strantford-upon-Avon.)
Every time someone (one of the Simpsons) says “Macbeth,”
something happens to McKellen. Among
other things, he’s struck by lightning and a chunk of concrete falls on his
head..
Hundreds of production of Macbeth have been mounted all over the world without mishap. There’s an African version, Welcome Msomi’s Umabatha: The Zulu Macbeth, for
instance, and Akira Kurasawa’s 1957 film, Throne
of Blood, is Shakespeare’s tragedy of medieval Scotland reset to feudal
Japan.
(I saw a production of Umabatha directed by the author for the
Johannesburg Civic Theatre at the Lincoln Center Festival in July 1997 and a
stage adaptation of the Kurosawa screenplay, directed and adapted by Ping Chong
for the Oregon Shakespeare Festival, at the Brooklyn Academy of Music in
November 2010.)
There’s also the famous 1936 Federal Theatre Project
production of Orson Welles’s “Voodoo” Macbeth with an African-American cast (set in the 19th century on a
Caribbean island)—which got into political trouble (as usual for both Welles
and the FTP), but no actual disasters occurred. [After posting this section of “Ghosts, Curses, & Charms,” I
discovered that this statement is historically inaccurate. See my corrective Comment below, dated 23
August 2020, for a fuller explanation. ~Rick]
The Macbeth curse
has become so much a part of our theater culture, even among non-show biz
people, that in recent years Playbill,
the national theater magazine, has published a number of articles that refer to
it. Here are some from the last 26
years—but just the ones in which the headline mentions the Macbeth superstition (many more include references within the article,
such as “8 Rules Every Theatre Person Must Follow—Do You Know All of Them?” by
Mark Robinson, 1 July 2019):
·
“Paradise Productions Curse Macbeth through Apr. 4,” 31 March 1998
·
“Chicago’s Oddlife Tempts Fate With Inaugural
Show: Macbeth, July 13,” 13 July 1998
·
“World Premiere of Lee Blessing’s The Scottish Play Finalizes Next La
Jolla Season,” 15 March 2004
·
“PLAYBILL.COM’S THEATRE WEEK IN REVIEW, Feb.
9-15: The Curse Is Off,” 15 February 2008
·
“ASK PLAYBILL.COM: Macbeth (‘The Scottish Play’),” 22 February 2008
·
“Shhh!: ‘Never Say Macbeth’ to Arrive on DVD in
August,” 11 June 2008
·
“Spiritual Symbol Protects Lincoln Center
Theater’s Macbeth From Legendary
Curse,” 1 January 2014
·
“Disaster Averted, Harlem Macbeth Goes on Tonight,” 8 July 2016
One of the articles above, “Spiritual Symbol Protects
Lincoln Center Theater’s Macbeth From Legendary Curse,” specifically discusses
an element in the set design apparently intended to ward off the evil
spell. Writer Robert Viagas asserts that
“the cast of the current [that is, 2014] Broadway revival of what is known as ‘the
Scottish play’ believes they may have found the antidote [to the play’s curse].”
The production in question is the Lincoln Center Theater’s Macbeth, which ran at the Vivian Beaumont Theatre
from 21 November 2013 to 12 January 2014.
Directed by Jack O'Brien, it featured Ethan Hawke as Macbeth, Anne-Marie
Duff in her Broadway début as Lady Macbeth, Richard Easton as Duncan, Brian d’Arcy
James as Banquo, Daniel Sunjata as Macduff, and Jonny Orsini as Malcolm. The rep company production ran for 60 regular
performances and was nominated for one award, a Drama Desk for Japhy Weideman’s
lighting design.
Viagas stated, “The
centerpiece of the show’s artwork is a mandala, created by set designer Scott Pask,
consisting of two circles, a pentagram and three heptagons, labeled with the
name of God and his angels, according to a program note.”
Mandala is a Sanskrit
word that refers to a “ritualistic geometric design, symbolic of the Universe,
used as an aid to meditation,” part of Hindu and Buddhist belief. Ben Brantley of the New York Times asserted that the figure is inspired by
Kaballah, a Jewish belief in mysticism that’s heavily reliant on numerology.
A pentagram is a five-pointed star formed by extending the sides of a pentagon until they
meet, forming five triangles on each side; it often has occult connotations. A heptagon is a seven-sided polygon; it’s
also a mystical symbol (7 is a magic number in numerology).
The LCT show was played right on the mandala because it was
painted in black on the theater’s circular stage floor. The mandala also appeared
on the show’s posters and program cover.
Pask’s design was based on John Dee’s 1582 “The Seal of God’s
Truth.” Dee (1527-1608 or 1609), a
contemporary of Shakespeare’s who’s believed to be one of the inspirations for
the wizard Prospero in The Tempest, was
a mathematician, astronomer, and scholar who was a member of the court of Queen
Elizabeth I. He claimed to have been
instructed in the mandala’s design by direct communication with angels.
Company members seemed to have felt the magic worked. Stephanie Fieger and Shirine Babb, two
members of the ensemble, reported “that the mandala seems to be warding off
most of the usual backstage glitches and gremlins that seem to bedevil many
productions.” They believed that the
image “has blessed the show and has given us the protection of the angels.”
The two actors concluded that “now we never have to worry
about the so-called Macbeth Curse! We can say the title all the time backstage
and we don’t ever encounter any of those things people say.” Still, the superstition is so ingrained in
the psyches of theater people that most say, like director O'Brien, “I don’t
believe in those things, but I don’t not
believe in those things.”
Stage manager Tripp Phillips echoed the director’s
sentiments: “I’m not a big superstitious person, but on the other hand there
are so many traditions in the theatre, like not whistling in the dressing rooms,
that we try to observe them. There’s no
point in tempting the Fates.”
While some “oddball incidents”—a mysteriously misbehaving (and
unmanned) dimmer and a recalcitrant on-stage banner—inexplicably occurred, the
production had been “uncharacteristically trouble-free,” affirmed Phillips. “I feel that this production has been a
blessing,” proclaimed the stage manager. “And if the mandala helps that, fantastic.”
[My survey of the strange beliefs of theater folk and
their stories of ghosts and hauntings turned out to be much more extensive than
I anticipated. I’ll be posting “Ghosts,
Curses, & Charms” as a series. This has been Part 1; Part 2 will be posted
on 17 August and will continue my discussion of superstitions. I’ll start the ghost stories in Part 3, to be
published on 20 August. (There may be a
Part 4, the conclusion of the ghost section; if there is, it’ll come out on 23 August.) I hope you’ll all come back to Rick On Theater for the continuation of “Ghosts, Curses,
& Charms: Theater Superstitions.”]
Near the end of "Ghosts, Curses, & Charms: Theater Superstitions – Part 1," posted above, I wrote that Orson Welles's 1936 "Voodoo" 'Macbeth' suffered "political trouble . . ., but no actual disasters." That's an error. I hadn't fact-checked sufficiently and later I discovered that there were some serious incidents.
ReplyDeleteFirst, because the atmosphere in Harlem, where the production was to be presented and was rehearsing, was so poisoned by rumors that the Negro Theatre Unit's 'Macbeth' would be a travesty intended to insult African-Americans before white society, Welles was attacked one night in the lobby of the Lafayette Theatre.
John Houseman's 1972 autobiography, 'Run-through,' and 'Orson Welles, A Biography' by Barbara Leaming (1985) differ on the details, with Houseman stating that there were four drunken attackers and Leaming affirming only one, armed with a razor blade strapped to his wrist. The director was saved by actor Canada Lee (1907-52), the production's Banquo, who was with Welles at the time.
Then, one night just before the 14 April 1936 opening, the company mutinied. At 4 a.m. in what Houseman described as "sheer exhaustion, weighed down by the heavy uniforms in which they had been working for ten hours," the cast rose up in anger and refused to continue the rehearsal.
In the end, a small riot broke out and some scenery was smashed and an actress was slightly injured when she was pushed off the stage. When it was over, the company did no more rehearsing that night, though the show opened as scheduled a few days later.
The major incident that could be attributed to the 'Macbeth' curse, if one were so inclined, seemed itself to have been of paranormal origin.
The Herald Tribune reviewer, Percy Hammond, a "conservative" (the Trib was a Republican-leaning paper), wrote a notice Houseman called "not so much of a review as an attack on the New Deal."
The leader of the drumming ensemble Welles inserted into the play was an "actual" voodoo witch doctor and he came to Houseman with his drummers the day the Trib review came out and asked about the author. Houseman agreed that the review was "an evil one," "The work of an enemy," and that Hammond was "a bad man."
That night, according to the house manager, there was "unusual drumming and chants more weird and horrible than anything that had been heard upon the stage" in the basement of the theater.
The play had opened on Tuesday, 14 April; Hammond's review was published on the 15th. On Saturday, 25 April, Hammond died of pneumonia--with which he'd suddenly fallen ill on Sunday, the 19th, four days after the drumming.
Hammond was 63 when he died.
After "Ghosts, Curses, & Charms: Theater Superstitions – Part 1" was posted, my friend Kirk Woodward e-mailed me: "I wrote a play about the 'Macbeth' curse, which I have attached. I thought the idea of having to say the word many times in a play was funny."
ReplyDeleteI read the one-act play, which is called 'That Scottish Play,' and it's really wonderful--and I'm pleased to see that I included in my post on the curse all the explanations Kirk used in the play--so it doesn't look like I left some out.
The play, which Kirk wrote late in 2019, long before I even thought of this post, reminds me of a Monty Python sketch! I can actually hear the Pythons doing it. (Kirk and I are both fans of the Pythons, and he agreed that 'That Scottish Play' "is definitely like a Python sketch!"--though he's "not sure I consciously had that in mind" when he composed it.)
The play has never been performed, but it, along with Kirk's other plays, are on his website, http://spiceplays.com/, along with information about cast sizes and royalties.
~Rick
Once again, Kirk Woodward has come forward with a bit of provocative information. He's been reading some books by James Shapiro, a professor of English and comparative literature at Columbia University who specializes in Shakespeare, and he sent me the following quotation.
ReplyDeleteThe passage is from 'The Year of Lear: Shakespeare in 1606' (Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2015) and relates to one of the accounts I included in the post above concerning the "'Macbeth' Curse":
"This early impulse to exaggerate the power of devilish forces has been reinforced by a theatrical tradition which maintains that 'Macbeth' alone among all of Shakespeare's works carries with it a curse: disaster will strike anyone who carelessly names '"Macbeth"' in a theater; actors who forget to call it 'the Scottish Play' or another safe title must say a charm to remove that curse. Despite strenuous efforts to trace this curse back to the play's early performances, it goes back no further than the late nineteenth century, when the humorist Max Beerbohm reviewed a production for the Saturday Review and fabricated a story - falsely attributing it to the seventeenth-century biographer John Aubrey - that 'Hal Berridge, the youth who was to have acted the part of Lady Macbeth, "fell sudden sickke of a pleurisie, wherefore Master Shakespeare himself did enacte in his stead."' What Beerbohm had invented – and his period spelling lent it a touch of authenticity – quickly became accepted as fact. Actors soon adduced additional examples of disasters that befell performers injured while staging 'Macbeth' (not all that surprising for a play in which sword fighting and slippery blood-splattered knives figure heavily), and in our Internet age this Victorian myth is now impossible to dislodge" (pp. 193-4).
According to Kirk's report to me, Shapiro has documented Beerbohm's writing in the quotation above. Kirk, who's also reading two other Shapiro works on the Bard, has promised to consider writing a review of the three books. (He's also said he's thinking of writing a post on Max Beerbohm for 'ROT' as well.)
~Rick